To understand the Lindhard formula, consider some limiting cases in 2 and 3 dimensions. The 1-dimensional case is also considered in other ways.
Three dimensions
Long wavelength limit
First, consider the long wavelength limit. For the denominator of the Lindhard formula, we get and for the numerator of the Lindhard formula, we get Inserting these into the Lindhard formula and taking the limit, we obtain where we used, and. This result is the same as the classical dielectric function.
Static limit
Second, consider the static limit. The Lindhard formula becomes Inserting the above equalities for the denominator and numerator, we obtain Assuming a thermal equilibrium Fermi–Dirac carrier distribution, we get here, we used and. Therefore, Here, is the 3D screening wave number defined as Then, the 3D statically screened Coulomb potential is given by And the Fourier transformation of this result gives known as the Yukawa potential. Note that in this Fourier transformation, which is basically a sum over all, we used the expression for small for every value of which is not correct. For a degenerated Fermi gas, the Fermi energy is given by So the density is At T=0,, so. Inserting this into the above 3D screening wave number equation, we obtain This is the 3D Thomas–Fermi screening wave number. For reference, Debye–Hückel screening describes the nondegenerate limit case. The result is, the 3D Debye–Hückel screening wave number.
Two dimensions
Long wavelength limit
First, consider the long wavelength limit. For the denominator of the Lindhard formula, and for the numerator, Inserting these into the Lindhard formula and taking the limit of, we obtain where we used, and.
Static limit
Second, consider the static limit. The Lindhard formula becomes Inserting the above equalities for the denominator and numerator, we obtain Assuming a thermal equilibrium Fermi–Dirac carrier distribution, we get here, we used and. Therefore, is 2D screening wave number defined as Then, the 2D statically screened Coulomb potential is given by It is known that the chemical potential of the 2-dimensional Fermi gas is given by and. So, the 2D screening wave number is Note that this result is independent of n.
One dimension
This time, consider some generalized case for lowering the dimension. The lower the dimension is, the weaker the screening effect. In lower dimension, some of the field lines pass through the barrier material wherein the screening has no effect. For the 1-dimensional case, we can guess that the screening affects only the field lines which are very close to the wire axis.
Experiment
In real experiment, we should also take the 3D bulk screening effect into account even though we deal with 1D case like the single filament. The Thomas–Fermi screening has been applied to an electron gas confined to a filament and a coaxial cylinder. For a K2Pt4Cl0.32·2.6H20 filament, it was found that the potential within the region between the filament and cylinder varies as and its effective screening length is about 10 times that of metallic platinum.