Hermite polynomials


In mathematics,[] the Hermite polynomials are a classical orthogonal polynomial sequence.
The polynomials arise in:
Hermite polynomials were defined by Pierre-Simon Laplace in 1810, though in scarcely recognizable form, and studied in detail by Pafnuty Chebyshev in 1859. Chebyshev's work was overlooked, and they were named later after Charles Hermite, who wrote on the polynomials in 1864, describing them as new. They were consequently not new, although Hermite was the first to define the multidimensional polynomials in his later 1865 publications.

Definition

Like the other classical orthogonal polynomials, the Hermite polynomials can be defined from several different starting points. Noting from the outset that there are two different standardizations in common use, one convenient method is as follows:
These equations have the form of a Rodrigues' formula and can also be written as,
The two definitions are not exactly identical; each is a rescaling of the other:
These are Hermite polynomial sequences of different variances; see the material on variances below.
The notation and is that used in the standard references.
The polynomials are sometimes denoted by, especially in probability theory, because
is the probability density function for the normal distribution with expected value 0 and standard deviation 1.
The th-order Hermite polynomial is a polynomial of degree. The probabilists' version has leading coefficient 1, while the physicists' version has leading coefficient.

Orthogonality

and are th-degree polynomials for. These polynomials are orthogonal with respect to the weight function
or
i.e., we have
Furthermore,
or
where is the Kronecker delta.
The probabilist polynomials are thus orthogonal with respect to the standard normal probability density function.

Completeness

The Hermite polynomials form an orthogonal basis of the Hilbert space of functions satisfying
in which the inner product is given by the integral
including the Gaussian weight function defined in the preceding section
An orthogonal basis for Lp space| is a complete orthogonal system. For an orthogonal system, completeness is equivalent to the fact that the 0 function is the only function orthogonal to all functions in the system.
Since the linear span of Hermite polynomials is the space of all polynomials, one has to show that if satisfies
for every, then.
One possible way to do this is to appreciate that the entire function
vanishes identically. The fact then that for every real means that the Fourier transform of is 0, hence is 0 almost everywhere. Variants of the above completeness proof apply to other weights with exponential decay.
In the Hermite case, it is also possible to prove an explicit identity that implies completeness.
An equivalent formulation of the fact that Hermite polynomials are an orthogonal basis for consists in introducing Hermite functions, and in saying that the Hermite functions are an orthonormal basis for.

Hermite's differential equation

The probabilists' Hermite polynomials are solutions of the differential equation
where is a constant. Imposing the boundary condition that should be polynomially bounded at infinity, the equation has solutions only if is a non-negative integer, and the solution is uniquely given by, where denotes a constant.
Rewriting the differential equation as an eigenvalue problem
the Hermite polynomials may be understood as eigenfunctions of the differential operator . This eigenvalue problem is called the Hermite equation, although the term is also used for the closely related equation
whose solution is uniquely given in terms of physicists' Hermite polynomials in the form, where denotes a constant, after imposing the boundary condition that should be polynomially bounded at infinity.
The general solutions to the above second-order differential equations are in fact linear combinations of both Hermite polynomials and confluent hypergeometric functions of the first kind. For example, for the physicists' Hermite equation
the general solution takes the form
where and are constants, are physicists' Hermite polynomials, and are physicists' Hermite functions. The latter functions are compactly represented as where are Confluent hypergeometric functions of the first kind. The conventional Hermite polynomials may also be expressed in terms of confluent hypergeometric functions, see below.
With more general boundary conditions, the Hermite polynomials can be generalized to obtain more general analytic functions for complex-valued. An explicit formula of Hermite polynomials in terms of contour integrals is also possible.

Recurrence relation

The sequence of probabilists' Hermite polynomials also satisfies the recurrence relation
Individual coefficients are related by the following recursion formula:
and,,.
For the physicists' polynomials, assuming
we have
Individual coefficients are related by the following recursion formula:
and,,.
The Hermite polynomials constitute an Appell sequence, i.e., they are a polynomial sequence satisfying the identity
Equivalently, by Taylor-expanding,
These umbral identities are self-evident and [|included] in the differential operator representation detailed below,
In consequence, for the th derivatives the following relations hold:
It follows that the Hermite polynomials also satisfy the recurrence relation
These last relations, together with the initial polynomials and, can be used in practice to compute the polynomials quickly.
Turán's inequalities are
Moreover, the following multiplication theorem holds:

Explicit expression

The physicists' Hermite polynomials can be written explicitly as
These two equations may be combined into one using the floor function:
The probabilists' Hermite polynomials have similar formulas, which may be obtained from these by replacing the power of with the corresponding power of and multiplying the entire sum by :

Inverse explicit expression

The inverse of the above explicit expressions, that is, those for monomials in terms of probabilists’ Hermite polynomials are
The corresponding expressions for the physicists’ Hermite polynomials follow directly by properly scaling this:

Generating function

The Hermite polynomials are given by the exponential generating function
This equality is valid for all complex values of and, and can be obtained by writing the Taylor expansion at of the entire function . One can also derive the generating function by using Cauchy's integral formula to write the Hermite polynomials as
Using this in the sum
one can evaluate the remaining integral using the calculus of residues and arrive at the desired generating function.

Expected values

If is a random variable with a normal distribution with standard deviation 1 and expected value, then
The moments of the standard normal may be read off directly from the relation for even indices:
where is the double factorial. Note that the above expression is a special case of the representation of the probabilists' Hermite polynomials as moments:

Asymptotic expansion

Asymptotically, as, the expansion
holds true. For certain cases concerning a wider range of evaluation, it is necessary to include a factor for changing amplitude:
which, using Stirling's approximation, can be further simplified, in the limit, to
This expansion is needed to resolve the wavefunction of a quantum harmonic oscillator such that it agrees with the classical approximation in the limit of the correspondence principle.
A better approximation, which accounts for the variation in frequency, is given by
A finer approximation, which takes into account the uneven spacing of the zeros near the edges, makes use of the substitution
with which one has the uniform approximation
Similar approximations hold for the monotonic and transition regions. Specifically, if
then
while for
with complex and bounded, the approximation is
where is the Airy function of the first kind.

Special values

The physicists' Hermite polynomials evaluated at zero argument are called Hermite numbers.
which satisfy the recursion relation.
In terms of the probabilists' polynomials this translates to

Relations to other functions

Laguerre polynomials

The Hermite polynomials can be expressed as a special case of the Laguerre polynomials:

Relation to confluent hypergeometric functions

The physicists' Hermite polynomials can be expressed as a special case of the parabolic cylinder functions:
in the right half-plane, where is Tricomi's confluent hypergeometric function. Similarly,
where is Kummer's confluent hypergeometric function.

Differential-operator representation

The probabilists' Hermite polynomials satisfy the identity
where represents differentiation with respect to, and the exponential is interpreted by expanding it as a power series. There are no delicate questions of convergence of this series when it operates on polynomials, since all but finitely many terms vanish.
Since the power-series coefficients of the exponential are well known, and higher-order derivatives of the monomial can be written down explicitly, this [|differential-operator representation] gives rise to a concrete formula for the coefficients of that can be used to quickly compute these polynomials.
Since the formal expression for the Weierstrass transform is, we see that the Weierstrass transform of is. Essentially the Weierstrass transform thus turns a series of Hermite polynomials into a corresponding Maclaurin series.
The existence of some formal power series with nonzero constant coefficient, such that, is another equivalent to the statement that these polynomials form an Appell sequence. Since they are an Appell sequence, they are a fortiori a Sheffer sequence.

Contour-integral representation

From the generating-function representation above, we see that the Hermite polynomials have a representation in terms of a contour integral, as
with the contour encircling the origin.

Generalizations

The probabilists' Hermite polynomials defined above are orthogonal with respect to the standard normal probability distribution, whose density function is
which has expected value 0 and variance 1.
Scaling, one may analogously speak of generalized Hermite polynomials
of variance, where is any positive number. These are then orthogonal with respect to the normal probability distribution whose density function is
They are given by
Now, if
then the polynomial sequence whose th term is
is called the umbral composition of the two polynomial sequences. It can be shown to satisfy the identities
and
The last identity is expressed by saying that this parameterized family of polynomial sequences is known as a cross-sequence.

"Negative variance"

Since polynomial sequences form a group under the operation of umbral composition, one may denote by
the sequence that is inverse to the one similarly denoted, but without the minus sign, and thus speak of Hermite polynomials of negative variance. For, the coefficients of are just the absolute values of the corresponding coefficients of.
These arise as moments of normal probability distributions: The th moment of the normal distribution with expected value and variance is
where is a random variable with the specified normal distribution. A special case of the cross-sequence identity then says that

Applications

Hermite functions

One can define the Hermite functions from the physicists' polynomials:
Thus,
Since these functions contain the square root of the weight function and have been scaled appropriately, they are orthonormal:
and they form an orthonormal basis of. This fact is equivalent to the corresponding statement for Hermite polynomials.
The Hermite functions are closely related to the Whittaker function :
and thereby to other parabolic cylinder functions.
The Hermite functions satisfy the differential equation
This equation is equivalent to the Schrödinger equation for a harmonic oscillator in quantum mechanics, so these functions are the eigenfunctions.

Recursion relation

Following recursion relations of Hermite polynomials, the Hermite functions obey
and
Extending the first relation to the arbitrary th derivatives for any positive integer leads to
This formula can be used in connection with the recurrence relations for and to calculate any derivative of the Hermite functions efficiently.

Cramér's inequality

For real, the Hermite functions satisfy the following bound due to Harald Cramér and Jack Indritz:

Hermite functions as eigenfunctions of the Fourier transform

The Hermite functions are a set of eigenfunctions of the continuous Fourier transform. To see this, take the physicists' version of the generating function and multiply by. This gives
The Fourier transform of the left side is given by
The Fourier transform of the right side is given by
Equating like powers of in the transformed versions of the left and right sides finally yields
The Hermite functions are thus an orthonormal basis of, which diagonalizes the Fourier transform operator.

Wigner distributions of Hermite functions

The Wigner distribution function of the th-order Hermite function is related to the th-order Laguerre polynomial. The Laguerre polynomials are
leading to the oscillator Laguerre functions
For all natural integers, it is straightforward to see that
where the Wigner distribution of a function is defined as
This is a fundamental result for the quantum harmonic oscillator discovered by Hip Groenewold in 1946 in his PhD thesis. It is the standard paradigm of quantum mechanics in phase space.
There are further relations between the two families of polynomials.

Combinatorial interpretation of coefficients

In the Hermite polynomial of variance 1, the absolute value of the coefficient of is the number of partitions of an -member set into singletons and pairs. The sum of the absolute values of the coefficients gives the total number of partitions into singletons and pairs, the so-called telephone numbers
This combinatorial interpretation can be related to complete exponential Bell polynomials as
where for all.
These numbers may also be expressed as a special value of the Hermite polynomials:

Completeness relation

The Christoffel–Darboux formula for Hermite polynomials reads
Moreover, the following completeness identity for the above Hermite functions holds in the sense of distributions:
where is the Dirac delta function, the Hermite functions, and represents the Lebesgue measure on the line in, normalized so that its projection on the horizontal axis is the usual Lebesgue measure.
This distributional identity follows by taking in Mehler's formula, valid when :
which is often stated equivalently as a separable kernel,
The function is the bivariate Gaussian probability density on, which is, when is close to 1, very concentrated around the line, and very spread out on that line. It follows that
when and are continuous and compactly supported.
This yields that can be expressed in Hermite functions as the sum of a series of vectors in, namely,
In order to prove the above equality for, the Fourier transform of Gaussian functions is used repeatedly:
The Hermite polynomial is then represented as
With this representation for and, it is evident that
and this yields the desired resolution of the identity result, using again the Fourier transform of Gaussian kernels under the substitution