Uniform 4-polytope
In geometry, a uniform 4-polytope is a 4-dimensional polytope which is vertex-transitive and whose cells are uniform polyhedra, and faces are regular polygons.
Forty-seven non-prismatic convex uniform 4-polytopes, one finite set of convex prismatic forms, and two infinite sets of convex prismatic forms have been described. There are also an unknown number of non-convex star forms.
History of discovery
- Convex Regular polytopes:
- * 1852: Ludwig Schläfli proved in his manuscript Theorie der vielfachen Kontinuität that there are exactly 6 regular polytopes in 4 dimensions and only 3 in 5 or more dimensions.
- Regular star 4-polytopes
- * 1852: Ludwig Schläfli also found 4 of the 10 regular star 4-polytopes, discounting 6 with cells or vertex figures small stellated dodecahedron| and great dodecahedron|.
- * 1883: Edmund Hess completed the list of 10 of the nonconvex regular 4-polytopes, in his book Einleitung in die Lehre von der Kugelteilung mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Anwendung auf die Theorie der Gleichflächigen und der gleicheckigen Polyeder .
- Convex semiregular polytopes:
- * 1900: Thorold Gosset enumerated the list of nonprismatic semiregular convex polytopes with regular cells in his publication On the Regular and Semi-Regular Figures in Space of n Dimensions.
- * 1910: Alicia Boole Stott, in her publication Geometrical deduction of semiregular from regular polytopes and space fillings, expanded the definition by also allowing Archimedean solid and prism cells. This construction enumerated 45 semiregular 4-polytopes.
- * 1911: Pieter Hendrik Schoute published Analytic treatment of the polytopes regularly derived from the regular polytopes, followed Boole-Stott's notations, enumerating the convex uniform polytopes by symmetry based on 5-cell, 8-cell/16-cell, and 24-cell.
- * 1912: E. L. Elte independently expanded on Gosset's list with the publication The Semiregular Polytopes of the Hyperspaces, polytopes with one or two types of semiregular facets.
- Convex uniform polytopes:
- *1940: The search was expanded systematically by H.S.M. Coxeter in his publication Regular and Semi-Regular Polytopes.
- * Convex uniform 4-polytopes:
- **1965: The complete list of convex forms was finally enumerated by John Horton Conway and Michael Guy, in their publication Four-Dimensional Archimedean Polytopes, established by computer analysis, adding only one non-Wythoffian convex 4-polytope, the grand antiprism.
- ** 1966 Norman Johnson completes his Ph.D. dissertation The Theory of Uniform Polytopes and Honeycombs under advisor Coxeter, completes the basic theory of uniform polytopes for dimensions 4 and higher.
- ** 1986 Coxeter published a paper Regular and Semi-Regular Polytopes II which included analysis of the unique snub 24-cell structure, and the symmetry of the anomalous grand antiprism.
- ** 1998-2000: The 4-polytopes were systematically named by Norman Johnson, and given by George Olshevsky's online indexed enumeration. Johnson named the 4-polytopes as polychora, like polyhedra for 3-polytopes, from the Greek roots poly and choros. The names of the uniform polychora started with the 6 regular polychora with prefixes based on rings in the Coxeter diagrams; truncation t0,1, cantellation, t0,2, runcination t0,3, with single ringed forms called rectified, and bi,tri-prefixes added when the first ring was on the second or third nodes.
- ** 2004: A proof that the Conway-Guy set is complete was published by Marco Möller in his dissertation, Vierdimensionale Archimedische Polytope. Möller reproduced Johnson's naming system in his listing.
- ** 2008: The Symmetries of Things was published by John H. Conway and contains the first print-published listing of the convex uniform 4-polytopes and higher dimensional polytopes by Coxeter group family, with general vertex figure diagrams for each ringed Coxeter diagram permutation—snub, grand antiprism, and duoprisms—which he called proprisms for product prisms. He used his own ijk-ambo naming scheme for the indexed ring permutations beyond truncation and bitruncation, and all of Johnson's names were included in the book index.
- Nonregular uniform star 4-polytopes:
- *2000-2005: In a collaborative search, up to 2005 a total of 1845 uniform 4-polytopes had been identified by Jonathan Bowers and George Olshevsky, with an additional four discovered in 2006 for a total of 1849 known so far.
Regular 4-polytopes
The existence of a regular 4-polytope is constrained by the existence of the regular polyhedra which becomes cells, and which becomes the vertex figure.
Existence as a finite 4-polytope is dependent upon an inequality:
The 16 regular 4-polytopes, with the property that all cells, faces, edges, and vertices are congruent:
- 6 regular convex 4-polytopes: 5-cell, 8-cell, 16-cell, 24-cell, 120-cell, and 600-cell.
- 10 regular star 4-polytopes: icosahedral 120-cell, small stellated 120-cell, great 120-cell, grand 120-cell, great stellated 120-cell, grand stellated 120-cell, great grand 120-cell, great icosahedral 120-cell, grand 600-cell, and great grand stellated 120-cell.
Convex uniform 4-polytopes
Symmetry of uniform 4-polytopes in four dimensions
The 16 mirrors of B4 can be decomposed into 2 orthogonal groups, 4A1 and D4:
|
The 24 mirrors of F4 can be decomposed into 2 orthogonal D4 groups: |
The 10 mirrors of B3×A1 can be decomposed into orthogonal groups, 4A1 and D3: |
Each reflective uniform 4-polytope can be constructed in one or more reflective point group in 4 dimensions by a Wythoff construction, represented by rings around permutations of nodes in a Coxeter diagram. Mirror hyperplanes can be grouped, as seen by colored nodes, separated by even-branches. Symmetry groups of the form , have an extended symmetry,
If all mirrors of a given color are unringed in a given uniform polytope, it will have a lower symmetry construction by removing all of the inactive mirrors. If all the nodes of a given color are ringed, an alternation operation can generate a new 4-polytope with chiral symmetry, shown as "empty" circled nodes", but the geometry is [|not generally adjustable to create uniform solutions].
Enumeration
There are 64 convex uniform 4-polytopes, including the 6 regular convex 4-polytopes, and excluding the infinite sets of the duoprisms and the antiprismatic prisms.- 5 are polyhedral prisms based on the Platonic solids
- 13 are polyhedral prisms based on the Archimedean solids
- 9 are in the self-dual regular A4 group family.
- 9 are in the self-dual regular F4 group family.
- 15 are in the regular B4 group family
- 15 are in the regular H4 group family.
- 1 special snub form in the group family.
- 1 special non-Wythoffian 4-polytope, the grand antiprism.
- TOTAL: 68 − 4 = 64
In addition to the 64 above, there are 2 infinite prismatic sets that generate all of the remaining convex forms:
- Set of uniform antiprismatic prisms - sr× - Polyhedral prisms of two antiprisms.
- Set of uniform duoprisms - × - A Cartesian product of two polygons.
The A4 family
Facets are given, grouped in their Coxeter diagram locations by removing specified nodes.
The three uniform 4-polytopes forms marked with an asterisk, *, have the higher extended pentachoric symmetry, of order 240, because the element corresponding to any element of the underlying 5-cell can be exchanged with one of those corresponding to an element of its dual. There is one small index subgroup +, order 60, or its doubling +, order 120, defining an omnisnub 5-cell which is listed for completeness, but is not uniform.
The B4 family
This family has diploid hexadecachoric symmetry, , of order 24×16=384: 4!=24 permutations of the four axes, 24=16 for reflection in each axis. There are 3 small index subgroups, with the first two generate uniform 4-polytopes which are also repeated in other families, , , and +, all order 192.Tesseract truncations
16-cell truncations
The snub 24-cell is repeat to this family for completeness. It is an alternation of the cantitruncated 16-cell or truncated 24-cell, with the half symmetry group . The truncated octahedral cells become icosahedra. The cubes becomes tetrahedra, and 96 new tetrahedra are created in the gaps from the removed vertices.The F4 family
This family has diploid icositetrachoric symmetry, , of order 24×48=1152: the 48 symmetries of the octahedron for each of the 24 cells. There are 3 small index subgroups, with the first two isomorphic pairs generating uniform 4-polytopes which are also repeated in other families, , , and +, all order 576.Like the 5-cell, the 24-cell is self-dual, and so the following three forms have twice as many symmetries, bringing their total to 2304.
The H4 family
This family has diploid hexacosichoric symmetry, , of order 120×120=24×600=14400: 120 for each of the 120 dodecahedra, or 24 for each of the 600 tetrahedra. There is one small index subgroups +, all order 7200.120-cell truncations
600-cell truncations
The D4 family
This demitesseract family, , introduces no new uniform 4-polytopes, but it is worthy to repeat these alternative constructions. This family has order 12×16=192: 4!/2=12 permutations of the four axes, half as alternated, 24=16 for reflection in each axis. There is one small index subgroups that generating uniform 4-polytopes, +, order 96.When the 3 bifurcated branch nodes are identically ringed, the symmetry can be increased by 6, as , and thus these polytopes are repeated from the 24-cell family.
Here again the snub 24-cell, with the symmetry group + this time, represents an alternated truncation of the truncated 24-cell creating 96 new tetrahedra at the position of the deleted vertices. In contrast to its appearance within former groups as partly snubbed 4-polytope, only within this symmetry group it has the full analogy to the Kepler snubs, i.e. the snub cube and the snub dodecahedron.
The grand antiprism
There is one non-Wythoffian uniform convex 4-polytope, known as the grand antiprism, consisting of 20 pentagonal antiprisms forming two perpendicular rings joined by 300 tetrahedra. It is loosely analogous to the three-dimensional antiprisms, which consist of two parallel polygons joined by a band of triangles. Unlike them, however, the grand antiprism is not a member of an infinite family of uniform polytopes.Its symmetry is the ionic diminished Coxeter group, 10,2+,10, order 400.
Prismatic uniform 4-polytopes
A prismatic polytope is a Cartesian product of two polytopes of lower dimension; familiar examples are the 3-dimensional prisms, which are products of a polygon and a line segment. The prismatic uniform 4-polytopes consist of two infinite families:- Polyhedral prisms: products of a line segment and a uniform polyhedron. This family is infinite because it includes prisms built on 3-dimensional prisms and antiprisms.
- Duoprisms: products of two polygons.
Convex polyhedral prisms
There are 18 convex polyhedral prisms created from 5 Platonic solids and 13 Archimedean solids as well as for the infinite families of three-dimensional prisms and antiprisms. The symmetry number of a polyhedral prism is twice that of the base polyhedron.
Tetrahedral prisms: A3 × A1
This prismatic tetrahedral symmetry is , order 48. There are two index 2 subgroups, and +, but the second doesn't generate a uniform 4-polytope.Octahedral prisms: B3 × A1
This prismatic octahedral family symmetry is , order 96. There are 6 subgroups of index 2, order 48 that are expressed in alternated 4-polytopes below. Symmetries are , , , , , and +.Icosahedral prisms: H3 × A1
This prismatic icosahedral symmetry is , order 240. There are two index 2 subgroups, and +, but the second doesn't generate a uniform polychoron.Duoprisms: p × q
The second is the infinite family of uniform duoprisms, products of two regular polygons. A duoprism's Coxeter-Dynkin diagram is. Its vertex figure is a disphenoid tetrahedron,.This family overlaps with the first: when one of the two "factor" polygons is a square, the product is equivalent to a hyperprism whose base is a three-dimensional prism. The symmetry number of a duoprism whose factors are a p-gon and a q-gon is 4pq if p≠q; if the factors are both p-gons, the symmetry number is 8p2. The tesseract can also be considered a 4,4-duoprism.
The elements of a p,q-duoprism are:
- Cells: p q-gonal prisms, q p-gonal prisms
- Faces: pq squares, p q-gons, q p-gons
- Edges: 2pq
- Vertices: pq
Infinite set of p-q duoprism - - p q-gonal prisms, q p-gonal prisms:
Name | Coxeter graph | Cells | Images | Net |
3-3 duoprism | 3+3 triangular prisms | |||
3-4 duoprism | 3 cubes 4 triangular prisms | |||
4-4 duoprism | 4+4 cubes | |||
3-5 duoprism | 3 pentagonal prisms 5 triangular prisms | |||
4-5 duoprism | 4 pentagonal prisms 5 cubes | |||
5-5 duoprism | 5+5 pentagonal prisms | |||
3-6 duoprism | 3 hexagonal prisms 6 triangular prisms | |||
4-6 duoprism | 4 hexagonal prisms 6 cubes | |||
5-6 duoprism | 5 hexagonal prisms 6 pentagonal prisms | |||
6-6 duoprism | 6+6 hexagonal prisms |
3-3 | 3-4 | 3-5 | 3-6 | 3-7 | 3-8 |
4-3 | 4-4 | 4-5 | 4-6 | 4-7 | 4-8 |
5-3 | 5-4 | 5-5 | 5-6 | 5-7 | 5-8 |
6-3 | 6-4 | 6-5 | 6-6 | 6-7 | 6-8 |
7-3 | 7-4 | 7-5 | 7-6 | 7-7 | 7-8 |
8-3 | 8-4 | 8-5 | 8-6 | 8-7 | 8-8 |
Polygonal prismatic prisms: p × ×
The infinite set of uniform prismatic prisms overlaps with the 4-p duoprisms: - - p cubes and 4 p-gonal prisms - The second polytope in the series is a lower symmetry of the regular tesseract, ×.Polygonal antiprismatic prisms: p × ×
The infinite sets of uniform antiprismatic prisms are constructed from two parallel uniform antiprisms): - - 2 p-gonal antiprisms, connected by 2 p-gonal prisms and 2p triangular prisms.A p-gonal antiprismatic prism has 4p triangle, 4p square and 4 p-gon faces. It has 10p edges, and 4p vertices.
Nonuniform alternations
Coxeter showed only two uniform solutions for rank 4 Coxeter groups with all rings alternated. The first is, s which represented an index 24 subgroup form of the demitesseract,, h. The second is, s, which is an index 6 subgroup form of the snub 24-cell,, s,.Other alternations, such as, as an alternation from the omnitruncated tesseract, can not be made uniform as solving for equal edge lengths are in general overdetermined. Such nonuniform alternated figures can be constructed as vertex-transitive 4-polytopes by the removal of one of two half sets of the vertices of the full ringed figure, but will have unequal edge lengths. Just like uniform alternations, they will have half of the symmetry of uniform figure, like +, order 192, is the symmetry of the alternated omnitruncated tesseract.
Wythoff constructions with alternations produce vertex-transitive figures that can be made equilateral, but not uniform because the alternated gaps create cells that are not regular or semiregular. A proposed name for such figures is scaliform polytopes. This category allows a subset of Johnson solids as cells, for example triangular cupola.
Each vertex configuration within a Johnson solid must exist within the vertex figure. For example, a square pramid has two vertex configurations: 3.3.4 around the base, and 3.3.3.3 at the apex.
The nets and vertex figures of the two convex cases are given below, along with a list of cells around each vertex.
Coxeter diagram | s3, | s3, |
Relation | 24 of 48 vertices of rhombicuboctahedral prism | 288 of 576 vertices of runcitruncated 24-cell |
Net | runcic snub cubic hosochoron | runcic snub 24-cell |
Cells | ||
Vertex figure | 3.4.3.4: triangular cupola 3.4.6: triangular cupola 3.3.3: tetrahedron 3.6.6: truncated tetrahedron | 3.4.3.4: triangular cupola 3.4.6: triangular cupola 3.4.4: triangular prism 3.6.6: truncated tetrahedron 3.3.3.3.3: icosahedron |
Geometric derivations for 46 nonprismatic Wythoffian uniform polychora
The 46 Wythoffian 4-polytopes include the six convex regular 4-polytopes. The other forty can be derived from the regular polychora by geometric operations which preserve most or all of their symmetries, and therefore may be classified by the symmetry groups that they have in common.Summary chart of truncation operations | Example locations of kaleidoscopic generator point on fundamental domain. |
The geometric operations that derive the 40 uniform 4-polytopes from the regular 4-polytopes are truncating operations. A 4-polytope may be truncated at the vertices, edges or faces, leading to addition of cells corresponding to those elements, as shown in the columns of the tables below.
The Coxeter-Dynkin diagram shows the four mirrors of the Wythoffian kaleidoscope as nodes, and the edges between the nodes are labeled by an integer showing the angle between the mirrors. Circled nodes show which mirrors are active for each form; a mirror is active with respect to a vertex that does not lie on it.
Operation | Schläfli symbol | Symmetry | Coxeter diagram | Description |
Parent | t0 | Original regular form | ||
Rectification | t1 | Truncation operation applied until the original edges are degenerated into points. | ||
Birectification | t2 | Face are fully truncated to points. Same as rectified dual. | ||
Trirectification | t3 | Cells are truncated to points. Regular dual | ||
Truncation | t0,1 | Each vertex is cut off so that the middle of each original edge remains. Where the vertex was, there appears a new cell, the parent's vertex figure. Each original cell is likewise truncated. | ||
Bitruncation | t1,2 | A truncation between a rectified form and the dual rectified form. | ||
Tritruncation | t2,3 | Truncated dual. | ||
Cantellation | t0,2 | A truncation applied to edges and vertices and defines a progression between the regular and dual rectified form. | ||
Bicantellation | t1,3 | Cantellated dual. | ||
Runcination | t0,3 | A truncation applied to the cells, faces and edges; defines a progression between a regular form and the dual. | ||
Cantitruncation | t0,1,2 | Both the cantellation and truncation operations applied together. | ||
Bicantitruncation | t1,2,3 | Cantitruncated dual. | ||
Runcitruncation | t0,1,3 | Both the runcination and truncation operations applied together. | ||
Runcicantellation | t0,1,3 | Runcitruncated dual. | ||
Omnitruncation | t0,1,2,3 | Application of all three operators. | ||
Half | h | = | Alternation of, same as | |
Cantic | h2 | = | Same as | |
Runcic | h3 | = | Same as | |
Runcicantic | h2,3 | = | Same as | |
Quarter | q | Same as | ||
Snub | s | Alternated truncation | ||
Cantic snub | s2 | Cantellated alternated truncation | ||
Runcic snub | s3 | Runcinated alternated truncation | ||
Runcicantic snub | s2,3 | Runcicantellated alternated truncation | ||
Snub rectified | sr | Alternated truncated rectification | ||
ht0,3 | Alternated runcination | |||
Bisnub | 2s | Alternated bitruncation | ||
Omnisnub | ht0,1,2,3 | + | Alternated omnitruncation |
See also convex uniform honeycombs, some of which illustrate these operations as applied to the regular cubic honeycomb.
If two polytopes are duals of each other, then bitruncating, runcinating or omnitruncating either produces the same figure as the same operation to the other. Thus where only the participle appears in the table it should be understood to apply to either parent.