The site is located in a fertile river valley that has been an important trade route; a railway still runs between the present-day village and the tell, transecting the neolithic site. The tell lies between the current village and the Quweiq river to the east, and its summit is measured at 444 m above sea level; the neolithic site extends to the south and lies about 20m lower.
Excavations
A survey in the late 1970s found evidence of settlement at the site from the Pre-Pottery Neolithic A period through to the Hellenistic period. The later phases of occupation are closely associated with the mound of the tell itself. The pre-pottery Neolithic phase however is associated with a wider area of about 3.5 hectares, extending to the south and south-west of the tell and covered by up to 2.5 m of later deposits through the Bronze Age and Iron Age. It is this area that has been the focus of detailed investigation since 1999 by a joint Polish-Syrian team led by Ryszard F. Mazurowski of Warsaw University and specialists from from DGAM, Syria under the auspices of the Polish Centre of Mediterranean Archaeology University of Warsaw. Thusfar about six areas have been investigated and four excavated: only about 1.5% of the entire site. After 2007 the excavations have been suspended due to the civil war in Syria. Before the excavations began, it was assumed that permanent sedentary settlements would occur only in combination with the first farming of cereals, and the first domestication and keeping of animals such as sheep and goats, marking the start of the Neolithic period, part of a transition between the proto-Neolithic and Pre-Pottery Neolithic A cultures. However the remains of the structures uncovered at Tell Qaramel appear to be older than this, giving the first evidence of permanent stone-built settlement. The site is roughly contemporary to that of Göbekli Tepe in Turkey.
Stratigraphy and chronology
The archeologists distinguish a preliminary epipaleolithic phase attested mostly by flint tools but no certain carbon samples. For the subsequent settlement they recognise 4 Early Aceramic Neolithic layers which according to radiocarbon dating have been partially overlapping.
Horizon
Mean date 2σ probability
No. samples
H0
16890-10980 BC conv.
4?
H1
10898-9670 BC cal.
11
H2
10464-9246 BC cal.
11
H3
9817-8711 BC cal.
9
H4
9305-8783 BC cal.
1
The excavators find an unbroken development so are skeptical about the common division in "Pre-Pottery Neolithic A" and "Pre-Pottery Neolithic B" phases, instead preferring "Early Aceramic Neolithic" for the proto-neolithic and PPNA, and "Late Aceramic Neolithic" for PPNB and PPNC. The dating is not without problems. The archeologists rejected several samples because the radiocarbon dates were inconsistent with the stratigraphy, but also otherwise the very early dates at Tell Qaramel appear too old as compared to dating of similar cultural phases at other sites. Comparison of the laboratory in Gliwice, Poland that executed the C14 analyses, with other laboratories, showed differences in either direction.
Highlights
Particularly striking are the remains of a succession of five round stone structures which the excavators recognise as the remains of towers. The lower, oldest one was about 6 m in diameter and appears to have had some communal function, having an elevated hearth at the center with two benches centered on it. The fourth phase was most massive, at about 7.5m in diameter with stone walls of about 2.25 m thick; it had no internal structure. It was damaged by fire and rebuilt, and may have been a defensive structure. The earliest phase has been carbon-dated to between the eleventh millennium and 9670 BC. This dating makes the structure roughly two millennia older than the stone tower found at Jericho, which was previously believed to be the oldest known tower structure in the world. Among the ornaments found was a rather large polished copper nugget from Horizon 2 - one of the earliest finds of metal in an archeological site. As malachite has been excavated too in Tell Qaramel, the copper nugget may have been collected from the malachite source. An attempt had been made to drill a hole through the copper like with other stone beads, but technology was not yet sufficiently advanced to process metal.
Mortuary practices
Remains of 20 individuals have been excavated, all adults: this may indicate that burial practice for infants and children was different, at another location or treated with less regard. Most bodies had their head removed, either by cutting shortly after dead, or after decay. This indicates a head cult, as is also attested in other pre-pottery Neolithic sites. While in some skulls teeth showed wear and caries, which is typical for a diet with carbohydrates like from grain, others were in good condition, which may indicate a pre-Neolithic diet.
