List of United States Supreme Court cases by the Burger Court


This is a partial chronological list of cases decided by the United States Supreme Court during the Burger Court, the tenure of Chief Justice Warren Earl Burger from June 23, 1969 through September 26, 1986.
Case nameCitationSummary--
Anderson's-Black Rock, Inc. v. Pavement Salvage Co.Standard of nonobviousness in U.S. patent law--
Alexander v. Holmes County Board of EducationDelays in school desegregation--
Goldberg v. KellyProcedural due process, hearing requirement--
In re WinshipWhen a juvenile is charged with an act which would be a crime if committed by an adult, every element of the offense must be proved beyond a reasonable doubt--
Waller v. FloridaCollateral estoppel as applied to the same factual situation in criminal trials, double jeopardy--
Ashe v. SwensonSame as in Waller v. Florida, above--
Walz v. Tax Commission of the City of New YorkTax exemption for churches--
Rowan v. U. S. Post Office Dept.Addressees have unreviewable discretion to refuse further mail from a given sender; senders do not have a constitutional right to keep someone on a mailing list for unwanted mail--
Welsh v. United StatesThe meaning of religion in determining conscientious objector status--
Williams v. FloridaTwelve-man jury--
North Carolina v. AlfordGuilty plea in criminal case--
Oregon v. MitchellAge and voting rights in state elections--
Massachusetts v. LairdCourt declined to hear a case related to the constitutionality of the Vietnam War--
Baird v. State Bar of Arizonastates cannot ban people from legal practice due to Communist party membership--
In re StolarA state cannot require bar applicants to list every organization he or she belonged to since starting law school—decided same day as Baird v. State Bar of Arizona--
Younger v. HarrisAbstention doctrine--
Citizens to Preserve Overton Park v. VolpeJudicial review of administrative agency actions--
Griggs v. Duke Power Co.Employment discrimination; disparate effect of employer practices--
Haywood v. National Basketball AssociationSherman Antitrust Act applied to the NBA--
Swann v. Charlotte-Mecklenburg Board of EducationUse of busing for school desegregation--
Richardson v. PeralesPhysicians' written reports of medical examinations of a disability claimant could constitute "substantial evidence" supportive of finding non-disability under the Social Security Act--
California v. ByersStatute requiring drivers to provide personal information at the scene of an accident does not infringe on one's Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination--
United States v. Thirty-seven PhotographsConstitutionality of ban on importation of obscene material--
Coates v. CincinnatiCriminal offenses on sidewalk--
Cohen v. CaliforniaFreedom of speech, fighting words/obscenity, “fuck the draft”--
Bivens v. Six Unknown Named AgentsImplied right of action in the Fourth Amendment--
Lemon v. KurtzmanLaws without a secular purpose violate the Establishment Clause--
Clay v. United StatesSince the Appeal Board gave no reason for the denial of a conscientious objector exemption, petitioner's conviction must be reversed--
New York Times Co. v. United StatesFreedom of the press, national security, Pentagon Papers--
Reed v. ReedExtended Fourteenth Amendment rights to women--
Parisi v. DavidsonConscientious objector status--
Papachristou v. JacksonvilleVagrancy ordinance held void for vagueness--
FTC v. Sperry & Hutchinson Trading Stamp Co.FTC may act against a company’s “unfair” business practices even though the practice is not an antitrust violation--
Hawaii v. Standard Oil Co. of CaliforniaStates cannot sue for general economic damage due to violation of antitrust laws--
Cruz v. BetoFree exercise of religion while in prison custody--
Commissioner v. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A.Tax reporting for banks prohibited from doing insurance business--
Eisenstadt v. BairdPrivacy, birth control--
Sierra Club v. MortonStanding in cases in which plaintiffs assert interest in aesthetic or recreational interest in property --
Wisconsin v. YoderFreedom of religion, high school education--
Apodaca v. OregonState juries may convict a defendant by less than unanimity--
Jackson v. IndianaIndefinite detention of a defendant incompetent to stand trial violates due process and equal protection--
Aikens v. CaliforniaMootness in a death penalty case--
The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore CompanyEnforceability of a forum selection clause--
Fuentes v. ShevinOpportunity to be heard--
Pennsylvania v. New YorkState of escheat for unclaimed money orders--
Flood v. KuhnBaseball and antitrust regulation--
United States v. U.S. District CourtFourth Amendment, Search and seizure, search warrants, wiretapping--
Barker v. WingoSixth Amendment and speedy trial--
Lloyd Corp. v. TannerFirst Amendment; private property; rights--
Laird v. TatumFreedom of speech rights cannot be chilled by the mere existence of government surveillance and data gathering--
Kois v. WisconsinNude photographs accompanying and rationally related to a newspaper story are entitled to constitutional free press protection--
Furman v. GeorgiaDeath penalty is cruel and unusual punishment under the Eighth Amendment; overruled by Gregg v. Georgia--
Board of Regents v. RothProcedural due process in firing non-tenured professor--
Perry v. SindermannFirst Amendment; de facto professor tenure--
Gravel v. United StatesProtection offered by the Speech or Debate Clause to non-legislative activity--
Branzburg v. HayesFirst Amendment; grand jury, journalists’ rights--
Kleindienst v. MandelU.S. Attorney General’s power to deny persons’ entry to the United States--
Gottschalk v. BensonComputer algorithms not considered patentable subject matter--
Bronston v. United StatesLiterally truthful statements under oath cannot be prosecuted as perjury even if intent was to mislead questioner--
United States v. DionisioCompelled production of voice samples and the Fourth and Fifth Amendment.--
United States v. Mara aka MarasovichCompelled production of handwriting samples--
United States v. Glaxo Group Ltd.When a patent is directly involved in an antitrust violation, the government may challenge the patent’s validity--
Roe v. WadeAbortion, due process, privacy--
Doe v. BoltonRestrictions on abortion--
United States v. Florida East Coast Railway Co.Due process right to a hearing when administrative rules are to be changed--
San Antonio Independent School Dist. v. RodriguezEqual protection, education--
Mescalero Apache Tribe v. JonesIndian taxation by states--
McClanahan v. Arizona State Tax Comm'nIndian taxation by states--
United States v. RussellActive government agent involvement in criminal conspiracy does not constitute entrapment; Rehnquist inadvertently creates possible "outrageous government conduct" standard--
Frontiero v. RichardsonEqual protection, gender discrimination in military dependency regulation--
Gagnon v. ScarpelliProbation hearings and due process--
McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenStandard of proof in employment discrimination cases--
Schneckloth v. BustamonteVoluntary searches are permissible without the knowledge to refuse them--
United States v. Students Challenging Regulatory Agency Procedures Standing to sue--
Miller v. CaliforniaFreedom of speech, Miller test for obscenity--
United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of FilmBan on importing obscene material stands but material to be reevaluated under Miller test--
Pittsburgh Press Co. v. Pittsburgh Commission on Human RelationsFreedom of the press, discriminatory commercial speech in classified advertising--
Norwood v. HarrisonEqual protection does not require equal state assistance to public and private schools and forbids assistance to private schools that discriminate on the basis of race--
Broadrick v. OklahomaOverbreadth of Oklahoma statute forbidding political activities by state employees--
Espinoza v. Farah Mfg. Co.Employers can refuse to hire foreign citizens without violating their civil rights--
North Dakota State Board of Pharmacy v. Snyder's Drug Stores, Inc.Court upholds North Dakota pharmacy ownership statute against substantive due process attack--
Lau v. NicholsForeign-language education and discrimination under the Civil Rights Act of 1964--
Cleveland Board of Education v. LaFleurOverly restrictive maternity leave regulations in public schools violate the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment--
Schlesinger v. HoltzmanPresidential war power--
United States v. MatlockFourth Amendment, search and seizure, "co-occupant consent rule"--
Morton v. RuizAdministrative law, Bureau of Indian Affairs improperly limited eligibility for general assistance benefits--
Johnson v. RobisonDifferent benefits for combat veterans and conscientious objectors does not violate equal protection or the free exercise clause--
Edelman v. JordanEleventh Amendment and disability payments--
Storer v. BrownPolitical campaign laws--
Village of Belle Terre v. BoraasUpholding a zoning ordinance which prevented multiple unrelated people from living together--
DeFunis v. OdegaardMootness--
Bob Jones University v. SimonA private university, notified by the IRS, about a new policy of denying tax-exempt status for private schools with racially discriminatory admissions policies. Petitioner sued for injunctive relief to prevent revocation--
Geduldig v. AielloDenial of benefits for work loss resulting from normal pregnancy does not violate the Equal Protection Clause--
Morton v. MancariHiring preferences given by Congress to Native Americans at the Bureau of Indian Affairs are not violative of the Due Process Clause of the Fifth Amendment.--
Commissioner v. Idaho Power Co.Income tax, capitalization of costs related to acquisition of capital assets--
Jenkins v. GeorgiaObscenity; motion picture Carnal Knowledge--
Miami Herald Publishing Co. v. TornilloFreedom of speech--
Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.First Amendment and defamation—narrowing New York Times v. Sullivan--
United States v. NixonJudicial review, executive privilege, separation of powers--
Milliken v. BradleySegregation, busing--
Taylor v. LouisianaWomen cannot be excluded from a jury pool, overturning Hoyt v. Florida--
Goss v. LopezDue process in suspending a student from school--
NLRB v. J. Weingarten, Inc.The Weingarten rights—rights of union members facing disciplinary proceedings--
Lefkowitz v. NewsomeGuilty pleas in state court and federal habeas corpus proceeding--
United States v. FeolaMens rea requirement for conspiracy is no greater than that for the substantive crime--
Schlesinger v. CouncilmanScope and jurisdiction of courts martial--
Stanton v. StantonDifferent ages of majority in the context of child support did not pass rational basis review regarding equal protection--
Dunlop v. BachowskiJudicial power and judicial review--
United States v. ParkCriminal liability of chief executive officer of a corporation for the misdeeds of the company--
Blue Chip Stamps v. Manor Drug StoresPrivate damages actions under Rule 10b-5 is confined to actual purchasers or sellers of securities--
Bigelow v. VirginiaFirst Amendment and commercial speech--
Cort v. AshElection law, implied cause of action--
Erznoznik v. City of JacksonvilleCity ordinance prohibiting the showing of films containing nudity by a drive-in theater violated First Amendment--
City of Richmond v. United StatesLimited Richmond, Virginia's right to annex land from surrounding counties--
Warth v. SeldinLaw of standing--
United States v. PeltierExclusionary Rule Not Applicable when officer relied on statute subsequently ruled unconstitutional--
O'Connor v. DonaldsonInstitutionalization of a non-dangerous mentally ill person--
Faretta v. CaliforniaCriminal defendants have the constitutional right to refuse counsel--
United States v. Brignoni-PonceThe Fourth Amendment requires reasonable suspicion for border patrol agents to stop vehicles near the border and ask about citizenship and immigration status; apparent Mexican ancestry does not qualify--
Rose v. LockeVagueness of a law against cunnilingus--
Rizzo v. GoodeFederalism and injunctions against city officials--
Buckley v. ValeoFirst Amendment and campaign finance reform--
Mathews v. EldridgeProcedural due process for termination of Social Security benefits--
Imbler v. PachtmanImmunity of prosecutors when acting within their official capacity--
Time, Inc. v. FirestoneRights of the media and public figures in defamation suits--
Colorado River Water Conservation District v. United StatesAbstention doctrine--
Dann v. JohnstonEarly case on the patentability of the business method patent--
Hills v. GautreauxFifth Amendment and Civil Rights Act of 1964--
United States v. Miller Fourth Amendment regarding financial information--
Hampton v. United StatesEntrapment and drug distribution--
Estelle v. WilliamsTrying a criminal defendant while he is clad in prison garb violates due process--
Virginia State Pharmacy Board v. Virginia Citizens Consumer CouncilCommercial speech—advertising prescription drug prices--
Washington v. DavisEqual protection--
Bryan v. Itasca CountyState taxation of Indians--
TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Materiality of false or misleading statements in proxy statements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934--
Kleppe v. New MexicoProtection of animals on land held by the Bureau of Land Management--
Doyle v. OhioImpeaching a defendant with his silence in response to the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona violates the Fifth Amendment--
Serbian Orthodox Diocese v. MilivojevichJudicial determination of internal disputes of church governance violates the Establishment Clause--
Hughes v. Alexandria Scrap Corp."Market participant exception" to the Dormant Commerce Clause--
National League of Cities v. UseryTenth Amendment sufficient to invalidate federal Fair Labor Standards Act; overruled by Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit Authority--
Young v. American Mini TheatresUpholding Detroit's ordinance regulating location of adult-oriented businesses--
Runyon v. McCraryRace discrimination in private school admissions under --
New Orleans v. DukesEqual protection does not limit a state's regulatory power regarding grandfather clauses--
Fitzpatrick v. BitzerLimitations imposed by the Eleventh Amendment on damages paid by states under Title VII--
Nebraska Press Association v. StuartStandards for regulating publicity in advance of a criminal trial--
Planned Parenthood of Central Missouri v. DanforthConstitutionality of various abortion regulations; the first such challenge after Roe v. Wade--
Gregg v. GeorgiaCapital punishment does not per se violate the Eighth Amendment--
Woodson v. North CarolinaMandatory death penalties and capital punishment--
South Dakota v. OppermanSearching an impounded vehicle is permissible under the Fourth Amendment--
United States v. JanisExclusionary rule does not apply in civil forfeiture proceedings--
Stone v. PowellViolations of the exclusionary rule may not be asserted in federal habeas corpus proceedings--
United States v. Martinez-FuerteRoutine stops of vehicles entering the United States made by the Border Patrol do not violate the Fourth Amendment--
Estelle v. GambleDeliberate indifference to prisoner medical needs is required to make out a violation of the Eighth Amendment--
Craig v. BorenSex discrimination in drinking ages--
Arlington Heights v. Metropolitan Housing Corp.Discriminatory intent required to make out a violation of the Equal Protection Clause--
Mt. Healthy City School District Board Of Education v. DoyleSchool districts are not arms of the state and cannot claim sovereign immunity under the Eleventh Amendment; First Amendment rights of public employees subject to adverse employment action possibly related to protected expression.--
Whalen v. RoeThe New York State Controlled Substance Act's requirement that doctors send a copy of prescriptions to the state department of health did not violate privacy rights--
Califano v. GoldfarbDiffering Social Security benefits for widows and widowers violates equal protection--
Complete Auto Transit, Inc. v. BradyConstitutional requirements for imposing state business privilege taxes on out-of-state corporations--
Brewer v. WilliamsSixth Amendment requires criminal defendants to have counsel during police interrogation conducted after indictment--
Ingraham v. WrightCorporal punishment of public school students--
Wooley v. MaynardState cannot compel citizens to display the state motto upon their vehicle license plates--
Bounds v. SmithRight of prisoners to access the courts requires prisons to furnish legal assistance--
Linmark Associates, Inc., v. Township of WillingboroMunicipality's ban on real estate signs unconstitutionally inhibited commercial speech--
Abood v. Detroit Board of EducationCompelling non-union members to support union political activities violates the First Amendment--
Moore v. City of East ClevelandZoning ordinances forbidding extended families to live in the same house violate due process--
Carey v. Population Services InternationalAvailability of contraceptives to girls under the age of 16--
National Socialist Party of America v. Village of SkokieProcedure to be afforded those denied the right to march--
Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising CommissionDormant Commerce Clause--
Beal v. DoeRight of a state to restrict use of federal funds for abortion--
United States v. ChadwickWarrantless search of double-locked luggage just placed in the trunk of a parked vehicle is not justified under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment--
Shaffer v. HeitnerQuasi in rem jurisdiction and minimum contacts--
Bates v. State Bar of ArizonaFirst Amendment constraints on advertising by lawyers--
Nixon v. Administrator of General ServicesPapers of President Nixon--
Zacchini v. Scripps-Howard Broadcasting Co.First Amendment limitations on suits for invasion of privacy--
Coker v. Georgiadeath penalty for rape unconstitutional under the Eighth Amendment--
Commissioner v. KowalskiTaxation of meals furnished by an employer. In this case, the Court interpreted Internal Revenue Code §119- and and Treas. Reg. §1.119-1--
Pennsylvania v. MimmsApplying Terry v. Ohio to car passengers--
Moore v. IllinoisSixth Amendment requires a criminal defendant to counsel at a lineup conducted after being indicted--
Browder v. Director, Department of CorrectionsFederal courts of appeals lack jurisdiction to hear untimely filed appeals--
Pfizer, Inc. v. Government of IndiaForeign nations, who may sue in federal court, may also obtain triple damages for violations of the Clayton Act--
Bordenkircher v. HayesProsecutors may threaten defendants with more serious charges in order to induce a guilty plea--
Zablocki v. RedhailMarriage as a fundamental right--
Oliphant v. Suquamish Indian TribeIndian tribal courts do not have inherent criminal jurisdiction to try and to punish non-Indians--
Ballew v. GeorgiaJuries in criminal trials may not have fewer than six members--
Lakeside v. OregonJury instructions regarding the right against self-incrimination and refusal to testify--
Stump v. SparkmanJudicial immunity--
Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Judicial deference to government agencies--
Frank Lyon Co. v. United StatesOwnership of realty in sale-leaseback for tax deduction for depreciation purposes.--
McDaniel v. PatyQualification of ministers to hold political office--
Elkins v. MorenoIn-state tuition at state universities for non-citizen students--
First National Bank of Boston v. BellottiFirst Amendment and corporate political contributions--
Landmark Communications, Inc. v. VirginiaPress freedom in judicial discipline proceedings--
Santa Clara Pueblo v. MartinezSovereign immunity of Indian tribes--
Flagg Bros., Inc. v. BrooksUpholding section of New York Uniform Commercial Code permitting repossession of goods by warehouse--
Baldwin v. Fish and Game Commission of MontanaAffirmed the right of the state of Montana to charge higher fees for out-of-state elk hunters--
Taylor v. KentuckyInstructing the jury in a criminal trial on the presumption of innocence and the meaning of proof beyond a reasonable doubt--
Ohralik v. Ohio State Bar AssociationState regulation of in-person solicitation of clients by lawyers--
Zurcher v. Stanford DailyStandards for issuing search warrants to third parties; special First Amendment protections for the press in keeping evidence of possible crimes--
Monell v. Department of Social ServicesLiability of municipal officials for violations of constitutional rights; they are not liable for merely employing the person who violated the person's rights, and do not enjoy absolute immunity for their actions--
Exxon Corp. v. Governor of MarylandDormant Commerce Clause and state petroleum regulation--
Tennessee Valley Authority v. HillInterpretation of the Endangered Species Act--
Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerJoinder and diversity jurisdiction--
Mincey v. ArizonaFourth Amendment does not provide a "murder scene exception" to the warrant-and-probable-cause requirement--
Parker v. FlookAlgorithms and patent law--
City of Philadelphia v. New JerseyDormant Commerce Clause prohibits banning importation of trash into a state--
United States v. John Federal government has exclusive jurisdiction under Major Crimes Act for serious offenses committed on an Indian reservation--
Duke Power Co. v. Carolina Environmental Study GroupConstitutionality of Price-Anderson Nuclear Industries Indemnity Act--
Penn Central Transportation Co. v. New York CitySubstantive due process, taking clause, landmarks preservation--
Franks v. DelawareChallenging false statements made in support of issuing a search warrant--
Regents of the University of California v. BakkeRacial discrimination, affirmative action--
Lockett v. OhioMitigating evidence required by the Eighth Amendment in capital sentencing proceedings--
FCC v. Pacifica FoundationFCC policing of obscenity--
Rakas v. IllinoisAsserting the Fourth Amendment rights of third persons--
Marquette Nat. Bank of Minneapolis v. First of Omaha Service Corp.State anti-usury laws cannot be enforced against nationally chartered banks located out of state--
Parklane Hosiery Co, Inc. v. ShorePreclusion doctrine--
Colautti v. FranklinPennsylvania's Abortion Control Act held void for vagueness--
Givhan v. Western Line Consolidated School DistrictFirst Amendment protects private conversations between public employees and superiors about matters of public concern--
Washington v. Confederated Bands and Tribes of the Yakima Indian NationPublic Law 280 allows a state to assume partial jurisdiction over Indian tribes--
Thor Power Tool Company v. CommissionerIncome tax in the United States; depreciation of a publisher's inventory--
Hisquierdo v. HisquierdoDividing federal railroad retirement benefits under state community property laws--
Scott v. IllinoisSixth Amendment right to counsel applies only to crimes for which the actual penalty is imprisonment--
Nevada v. HillStates are not immune from suit in the courts of other states--
National Labor Relations Board v. Catholic Bishop of ChicagoNational Labor Relations Act does not extend to teachers employed by church-operated schools--
New York City Transit Authority v. BeazerCivil Rights Act of 1964 and legality of discrimination against methadone users--
Delaware v. ProuseFourth Amendment forbids stopping a motorist to check for a driver's license in the absence of reasonable suspicion to believe the driver has violated a traffic law--
United States v. CaceresFourth Amendment does not require exclusion of evidence seized in violation of governmental regulation--
Burch v. LouisianaAt a criminal trial, a six-member trial must be unanimous--
Caban v. MohammedNew York law allowing an unwed mother, but not an unwed father, a veto over adoption of their child violates the Equal Protection Clause--
Addington v. TexasInvoluntarily committing a person to a mental hospital requires a clear and convincing standard of proof--
United States v. 564.54 Acres of LandTakings Clause only requires payment of fair market value to landowner--
Bell v. WolfishRights of accused persons being held in prison pending trial--
Cannon v. University of ChicagoGender discrimination, implied cause of action--
Greenholtz v. Inmates of the Nebraska Penal and Correctional ComplexDue process liberty interest in parole--
Personnel Administrator of Massachusetts v. FeeneyGovernment employment preferences for veterans do not constitute sex discrimination--
Torres v. Puerto RicoFourth Amendment applies to Puerto Rico--
Sandstrom v. MontanaInstructing the jury on the burden of proof in criminal trials--
Wilson v. Omaha TribeFederal law governs an Indian tribe's right of possession to land--
Califano v. YamasakiProcedural due process and the Social Security Act--
Fare v. Michael C.Invocation of the Miranda rights by asking for a probation officer--
Smith v. MarylandLeaves call detail records outside the protection of the Fourth Amendment--
Arkansas v. SandersAbsent exigency, the warrantless search of personal luggage merely because it was located in an automobile lawfully stopped by the police is not justified under the automobile exception to the Fourth Amendment--
United Steel Workers of America v. WeberRegarding affirmative action, reverse discrimination--
Gannett Co. v. DePasqualeStanding of the press to assert violations of the right to a public trial--
Bellotti v. BairdParental notification requirements for abortion are constitutional with a judicial bypass provision--
Ybarra v. IllinoisA person's mere presence at a place for which the police have a warrant to search does not allow the police to search that person--
Goldwater v. CarterJusticiability, political question doctrine--
Vance v. TerrazasA U.S. citizen cannot have her citizenship taken away without proof, by a preponderance of evidence, that he or she acted with an intention to relinquish that citizenship--
World-Wide Volkswagen Corp v. WoodsonPersonal jurisdiction, strict liability--
Village of Schaumburg v. Citizens for a Better EnvironmentFirst Amendment protection for door-to-door soliciting--
Trammel v. United StatesMarital privilege under the Federal Rules of Evidence--
Rummel v. EstelleLife in prison with possibility of parole is not cruel and unusual punishment for a habitual offender convicted of passing bad checks--
Vitek v. JonesDue process liberty interest in forcible commitment to a mental hospital--
Payton v. New YorkFourth Amendment prohibits warrantless entry into a home to effect a routine felony arrest--
Owen v. City of IndependenceMunicipal liability under the Civil Rights Act--
Mobile v. BoldenAt-Large voting system and the Fifteenth Amendment--
Rhode Island v. InnisMeaning of "interrogation" under Miranda v. Arizona--
Cuyler v. SullivanCriminal defendant's right to counsel not saddled by a conflict of interest--
Godfrey v. GeorgiaEighth Amendment overbreadth of an aggravating circumstance required for imposing the death penalty--
United States V. MendenhallPolice may obtain consent to detain a person and search them under the Fourth Amendment--
Walker v. Armco Steel Corp.Erie Doctrine, state statute of limitations vs. Federal Rules of Civil Procedure--
Pruneyard Shopping Center v. RobinsFederalism, freedom of speech--
Jenkins v. AndersonCriminal defendant's silence prior to arrest may be held against him in court--
Agins v. City of TiburonZoning and regulatory takings--
Diamond v. ChakrabartyPatentability of genetically modified organisms--
Consolidated Edison Co. v. Public Service CommissionFreedom of speech --
Central Hudson Gas & Electric Corp. v. Public Service CommissionCommercial speech, energy company advertising--
Beck v. AlabamaLesser-included instructions in capital murder cases--
United States v. RaddatzFederal district court review of determinations by federal magistrate judges--
United States v. PaynerCourt's supervisory power does not allow application of exclusionary rule even where third party's Fourth Amendment rights were clearly violated--
Maine v. Thiboutot42 U.S.C. § 1983 allows suits for violations of federal statutory law--
Adams v. TexasJuror oaths regarding factual deliberations in capital cases--
Ohio v. RobertsHearsay is admissible under the Sixth Amendment if it bears particular guarantees of trustworthiness; overruled by Crawford v. Washington--
White Mountain Apache Tribe v. BrackerState is not allowed to tax a non-Indian contractor who works exclusively on a reservation--
Harris v. McRaeStates not required to fund abortions--
United States v. Sioux Nation of IndiansSeizure of Native American lands--
Fullilove v. KlutznickEqual protection, government contract set-aside for minority-owned businesses--
Industrial Union Department v. American Petroleum InstituteAdministrative law, determining OSHA's powers to regulate toxic chemicals in the workplace--
Stone v. GrahamRequiring privately funded posting of the Ten Commandments in public school classrooms violates the Establishment Clause--
Upjohn Co. v. United StatesAttorney–client privilege--
Minnesota v. Clover Leaf Creamery Co.Ban on nonreturnable milk containers under the rational basis test of equal protection--
Fedorenko v. United StatesRevoking the citizenship of a naturalized former concentration camp guard--
Diamond, Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks v. Diehr et al.Patentability of machines controlled by computer software--
H. L. v. MathesonUpholding parental notification law for minors' abortions--
Michael M. v. Superior Court of Sonoma CountySex discrimination in statutory rape laws--
Kassel v. Consolidated Freightways Corp.Iowa state restriction on tractor trailer length violated Dormant Commerce Clause--
Thomas v. Review Board of the Indiana Employment Security Divisionreligious pacifism and unemployment benefits under the Free Exercise Clause--
Estelle v. SmithStatements taken in violation of the Fifth and Sixth Amendment rights to counsel may not be admitted at a capital sentencing proceeding--
Edwards v. ArizonaPolice may not initiate questioning once a suspect has invoked his rights under Miranda v. Arizona--
Parratt v. TaylorMere negligence does not state a claim for a due process violation under 42 U.S.C. § 1983--
Lassiter v. Department of Social ServicesRight to counsel in parental termination proceedings--
Connecticut Board of Pardons v. DumschatDue process right to commutation of life sentences--
Rostker v. GoldbergEqual Protection Clause, women exempt from Selective Service registration--
City of Newport v. Fact Concerts, Inc.Punitive damages against municipalities in suits under 42 U.S.C. § 1983--
Haig v. AgeePower of Executive Branch to revoke passports--
California v. PrysockPhrasing of the warnings required by Miranda v. Arizona--
New York v. Beltonscope of a lawful search incident to the arrest of a passenger in an automobile includes things inside the passenger compartment--
Metromedia, Inc. v. City of San DiegoMunicipal regulation of billboards under the First Amendment--
Dames & Moore v. ReganExecutive authority over foreign affairs, International Emergency Economic Powers Act--
Piper Aircraft Co. v. ReynoForum non conveniens doctrine--
Widmar v. VincentUse of state university classroom space by religious student groups--
Polk County v. DodsonLiability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 for violations of constitutional rights allegedly committed by public defenders--
Cabell v. Chavez-SalidoCitizenship requirements for probation officers--
Valley Forge Christian College v. Americans United for Separation of Church and StateStanding to sue for alleged violations of the Establishment Clause--
Community Communications Co. v. City of BoulderMunicipalities may not allow monopolies under home rule and instead must rely on policies enacted at the state level.--
Eddings v. OklahomaScope of mitigation evidence presented at a sentencing hearing in a capital case required by the Eighth Amendment--
Merrion v. Jicarilla Apache TribeTribal sovereignty, an Indian tribe is authorized to impose a severance tax on non-Indian oil companies drilling on reservation land--
United States v. LeeReligious opposition to participation in Social Security--
Hoffman Estates v. The Flipside, Hoffman Estates, Inc.Overbreadth doctrine does not apply to commercial speech--
Rose v. LundyExhaustion requirement in federal habeas proceedings--
Santosky v. KramerStandard of proof in parental termination proceedings must be at least clear and convincing evidence--
American Society Of Mechanical Engineers v. Hydrolevel Corp.Non-profit associations are liable for treble damages under the Sherman Antitrust Act due to antitrust violations--
Oregon v. KennedyDouble jeopardy protections for retrial after a mistrial is granted--
United States v. RossAcceptable scope of a warrantless search of an automobile that has been legitimately stopped and that the police have probable cause to believe contains contraband--
Plyler v. DoeIllegal immigrants and public education--
Youngberg v. RomeoRights of the involuntarily committed and mentally retarded--
Nixon v. FitzgeraldQualified immunity of executive branch officials--
Harlow v. FitzgeraldAbsolute immunity for executive branch officials--
Board of Education, Island Trees School District v. PicoRight to remove "objectionable" books from school libraries--
Northern Pipeline Co. v. Marathon Pipe Line Co.Article III of the U.S. Constitution and the Bankruptcy Code--
Loretto v. Teleprompter Manhattan CATV Corp.Per se rule of takings clause--
Mississippi University for Women v. HoganSingle-sex nursing schools and the Equal Protection Clause--
New York v. FerberStates may ban sexual images of minors even where material does not meet existing tests of obscenity--
Enmund v. FloridaFelony murder and the death penalty--
United States v. Valenzuela-BernalConstitutionality of deporting aliens who might give testimony in criminal alien smuggling prosecutions--
NAACP v. Claiborne Hardware Co.First Amendment protection for boycotts--
Sporhase v. Nebraska ex rel. DouglasNebraska statute forbidding commercial exportation of water violated the Dormant Commerce Clause--
Larkin v. Grendel's Den, Inc.Allowing churches to veto nearby liquor licenses violates the Establishment Clause--
Hewitt v. HelmsProcedural due process protections for prisoners transferred to administrative segregation--
South Dakota v. NevilleAdmitting evidence of refusal to submit to field sobriety tests does not violate the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination--
Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Constr. Corp.Colorado River abstention and enforcement of arbitration clauses in diversity--
Briscoe v. LaHueTitle 42 U.S.C. § 1983 did not authorize a convicted state defendant to assert a claim for damages against a police officer for giving perjured testimony at the defendant's criminal trial--
District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanReview of state court decisions by U.S. District Courts--
Florida v. RoyerSearch and seizure of an airline passenger walking through an airport--
Metropolitan Edison Co. v. People Against Nuclear EnergyEnvironmental law; psychological effects do not need to be evaluated as part of an Environmental Impact Report--
Minneapolis Star Tribune Company v. CommissionerSpecial taxes on ink and paper violate the First Amendment--
Anderson v. CelebrezzeFiling deadlines for independent candidates may not be extraordinarily early--
City of Los Angeles v. LyonsStanding, requirement of plausible threat of future injury for an injunction to issue--
Connick v. MyersFree speech rights of public employees for public speech at work--
Pacific Gas & Electric v. State Energy Resources Conservation of Development CommissionPreemption, nuclear power--
Commissioner v. TuftsUnanimous decision on when a taxpayer sells or disposes of property encumbered by a nonrecourse obligation exceeding the fair market value of the property sold, the Commissioner of Internal Revenue may require him to include in the “amount realized” the outstanding amount of the obligation; the fair market value of the property is irrelevant to this calculation.--
Kolender v. LawsonRequiring loiterers or wanderers on the streets to present identification and to account for their presence when requested by a police officer is unconstitutional--
Heckler v. CampbellHHS Secretary's power to promulgate guidelines defining disability--
Regan v. Taxation with Representation of WashingtonRestricting 501 nonprofit organizations from engaging in political activity does not violate the First Amendment--
Bob Jones University v. United StatesFreedom of religion and tax exemptions--
Illinois v. GatesValidity of searches conducted pursuant to warrants predicated on an informant's tip--
City of Akron v. Akron Center for Reproductive HealthRequiring abortions to be performed in a hospital, restricting abortion to girls over 16, and requiring a doctor to impart certain information before performing an abortion are all unconstitutional--
United States v. PlaceDog sniff is not a search under the Fourth Amendment--
INS v. ChadhaUnconstitutionality of the legislative veto--
Oregon v. BradshawProtections of Miranda v. Arizona when the suspect reinitiates conversation with the police--
Bolger v. Youngs Drug Products Corp.First Amendment, definition of commercial speech--
Solem v. HelmLife without parole for passing bad checks is cruel and unusual punishment--
Jones v. United StatesVerdict of not guilty by reason of insanity is sufficiently probative of mental illness and dangerousness to justify involuntary commitment--
United States v. Sells Engineering, Inc.Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionInsider trading, interpretation of Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934
Dirks v. Securities & Exchange CommissionInsider trading, interpretation of Rule 10b-5 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934--
Marsh v. ChambersEstablishment Clause does not forbid state legislatures from employing chaplains--
Barefoot v. EstelleAdmissibility of psychiatrist's testimony about a criminal's future dangerousness--
Michigan v. Long“Adequate and independent state ground”--
Sony Corp. v. Universal City Studios Copyright, VCR "time-shifting", fair use--
Southland Corp. v. KeatingFederal Arbitration Act applies to actions in state courts--
McKaskle v. WigginsStandby counsel does not violate criminal defendant's Sixth Amendment right to present his own case in a criminal trial--
Grove City College v. BellAcquiescence to federal anti-discrimination regulations through acceptance of federal funds--
Lynch v. DonnellyPublic religious display on private property--
Calder v. JonesMinimum contacts for personal jurisdiction based on a libelous publication--
United Building & Construction Trades Council v. Mayor and Council of CamdenPrivileges and Immunities clause--
Oliver v. United StatesReaffirmed open fields doctrine in a case where the defendant grew marijuana in his field--
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. DelgadoFourth Amendment requirements for administrative searches--
Helicopteros Nacionales de Colombia, S. A. v. HallPurchases in the United States by a non-resident corporation are insufficient under the minimum contacts test to establish in personam jurisdiction--
Bose Corp. v. Consumers Union of United States, Inc.Appellate courts may make finding of "actual malice" required for libel claims against public figures by the First Amendment--
Strickland v. WashingtonStandard for ineffective assistance of counsel under the Sixth Amendment--
Members of the City Council of the City of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for VincentFirst Amendment regulation of posting of campaign signs--
Waller v. GeorgiaSixth Amendment right to a public trial--
South-Central Timber Development, Inc. v. WunnickeMarket participant exception to the Dormant Commerce Clause--
United States v. GouveiaRight to counsel for prisoners under administrative segregation--
Bernal v. FainterCitizenship of notaries public--
Hawaii Housing Authority v. MidkiffLand use law, takings to redistribute private property--
Immigration and Naturalization Service v. StevicAliens must establish a clear probability of persecution to avoid deportation--
California v. TrombettaPreservation of breath samples in DUI cases not required under the Due Process Clause--
New York v. QuarlesMiranda rights--
Chevron U.S.A. v. Natural Resources Defense CouncilJudicial review of the interpretation of statutes by government agencies--
Clark v. C.C.N.V.Right to sleep in public parks--
FCC v. League of Women Voters of CaliforniaRevert regulation on "editorializing" by government funded broadcasters--
Brown v. Hotel and Restaurant EmployeesNew Jersey Casino Control Act was not preempted by the National Labor Relations Act--
Hudson v. PalmerPrison inmates have no reasonable expectation of privacy in their cells under the Fourth Amendment, and destruction of property did not constitute a Due Process violation under the Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments because Virginia had adequate state law remedies.--
Roberts v. United States JayceesFirst Amendment freedom of association and excluding women as members of a private club--
Regan v. Time, Inc.Artistic depictions of United States currency--
Allen v. WrightStanding to sue for executive action alleged to promote racial discrimination by third parties--
United States v. LeonSearch and seizure, "good faith" exception to exclusionary rule--
Mills Music, Inc v. SnyderAssignment of royalties under the Copyright Act--
New Jersey v. T. L. O.Search and seizure at a public high school--
Evitts v. LuceyEffective assistance of counsel in appeals in criminal cases--
Wainwright v. WittSelection of jurors in death penalty cases--
United States v. MaineLong Island is an extension of the mainland and the bordering sounds are therefore under state regulatory control--
Garcia v. San Antonio Metropolitan Transit AuthorityApplication of minimum wage laws to state governments--
Ake v. OklahomaRight of the accused asserting insanity to a state-appointed psychiatrist--
Dean Witter Reynolds Inc. v. ByrdArbitration clauses must be enforced even if bifurcated and inefficient proceedings result--
Supreme Court of New Hampshire v. PiperResidency requirements for membership in the state bar--
Oregon v. ElstadApplying the exclusionary rule to violations of the Miranda rights--
Cleveland Board of Education v. LoudermillDue process right of public employees to be heard before termination--
Winston v. LeeCompelled surgical intrusion into an individual's body for evidence violates suspect's Fourth Amendment rights--
Heckler v. ChaneyForcing the Food and Drug Administration to determine whether it is legal to use certain drugs for lethal injection--
Tennessee v. GarnerRestriction on the use of deadly force as part of the Fleeing felon rule.--
Board of Trustees of Scarsdale v. McCrearyEstablishment of religion issue by displaying a nativity scene on public land--
Burger King v. RudzewiczPersonal jurisdiction, "purposeful availment"--
Harper & Row v. Nation EnterprisesFair use of copyrighted material--
Landreth Timber Co. v. LandrethSecurities Act of 1933 and the "sale of business" doctrine--
Wallace v. JaffreeSchool sponsorship of voluntary religious observances--
Superintendent, Mass. Correctional Institute at Walpole v. HillPrison disciplinary decisions to revoke good-time credits must be supported by "some evidence"--
McDonald v. SmithPetition Clause of First Amendment does not provide absolute immunity to charges of defamation--
Brockett v. Spokane Arcades, Inc.Regulation of adult bookstores--
Mitchell v. ForsythCivil liability for conducting warrantless wiretaps--
Aspen Skiing Co. v. Aspen Highlands Skiing Corp.Antitrust and alteration of marketing cooperation agreement--
Thornton v. CaldorConstitutionality of Sabbath laws--
Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.First Amendment, libel in credit reporting--
Dowling v. United StatesCopyright infringement as theft--
Aguilar v. FeltonUsing federal funds to pay teachers in parochial schools under the Establishment Clause--
City of Cleburne v. Cleburne Living Center, Inc.Equal protection for the mentally disabled--
United States v. Montoya de HernandezConstitutionality of body cavity searches at the border under the Fourth Amendment--
Thomas v. Union Carbide Agricultural Products Co.Article III and the arbitration provisions of FIFRA--
Mitsubishi Motors Corp. v. Soler Chrysler-Plymouth, Inc.Private antitrust claims under Sherman Act are arbitrable, even before foreign panel--
United States v. BagleyProsecutors must disclose information useful for impeaching government witnesses under Brady v. Maryland--
Heath v. AlabamaDouble jeopardy clause of the Fifth Amendment does not prevent one state from trying and punishing someone for an act for which he has already been convicted and sentenced by another state--
Witters v. Washington Department of Services For the BlindConstitutionality of public aid paid directly to students of Christian colleges--
Vasquez v. HilleryRace discrimination in selecting grand juries--
Cabana v. BullockAppellate courts may make the finding required by Enmund v. Florida in the first instance--
Nix v. WhitesidePresentation of perjured testimony at a criminal trial; Sixth Amendment right to counsel--
Fisher v. City of BerkeleyRent control ordinances and the Sherman Antitrust Act--
Goldman v. WeinbergerReligious headwear for military personnel under the Establishment Clause--
Michigan v. JacksonSuspect confessions and the Sixth Amendment right to counsel--
Philadelphia Newspapers, Inc. v. HeppsFirst Amendment constraints on libel actions; private-figure plaintiffs must show falsity of statements--
Batson v. KentuckyPeremptory challenge, racial discrimination--
Poland v. ArizonaReimposing the death penalty after the underlying murder conviction has been vacated--
California v. CiraoloNaked-eye aerial observation of defendant's backyard by police does not violate the Fourth Amendment--
Dow Chemical Co. v. United StatesAerial photography of industrial facilities by the EPA does not violate Fourth Amendment—decided same day as Ciraolo--
Brown-Forman Distillers Corp. v. New York State Liquor AuthorityPrice controls on alcoholic beverages and the Commerce Clause--
Bowen v. RoyFreedom of religion and Social Security numbers--
Thornburgh v. American College of Obstetricians and GynecologistsRequiring "informed consent" before an abortion--
Meritor Savings Bank v. Vinson"Hostile work environment" as sexual harassment--
McMillan v. PennsylvaniaMandatory minimum sentences are not elements of crimes subject to proof beyond a reasonable doubt--
Maine v. TaylorException to Dormant Commerce Clause--
Anderson v. Liberty LobbyStandard for summary judgment--
Celotex Corp. v. CatrettStandard for summary judgment--
Ford v. WainwrightCompetence to be executed--
Press-Enterprise Co. v. Superior CourtFirst Amendment free press guarantee and the right to a transcript of a preliminary hearing--
Bowers v. HardwickSodomy and substantive due process; overruled by Lawrence v. Texas --
Posadas de Puerto Rico Associates v. Tourism Company of Puerto RicoCentral Hudson test and First Amendment commercial speech--
Allen v. IllinoisStatements made in civil commitment proceedings for sex offenders are not subject to the Fifth Amendment privilege against self-incrimination--
Bethel School District v. FraserCensorship of obscene speech at a school assembly--
Bowsher v. SynarGramm–Rudman–Hollings Balanced Budget Act, office of Comptroller General, separation of powers--
Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals Inc. v. ThompsonFederal courts cannot claim original jurisdiction for violation of a statute which does not provide a private cause of action--
Commodity Futures Trading Commission v. SchorJurisdiction of Article I and Article III tribunals, waiver of Article III jurisdiction--