List of Indian states and territories by Human Development Index
The national average HDI for India in 2008 was 0.467. By 2010, its average HDI had risen to 0.519. UNDP, the sponsor of Human Development Index methodology since 1990, reported India's HDI to be 0.554 for 2012, an 18% increase over its 2008 HDI. United Nations declared India's HDI is 0.586 in 2014, a 5.77% increase over 2012. As for the year 2018, HDI for India stood at 0.647.
HDI is composite index that takes into consideration health, Education and Per capita income.
List
This is a list of Indian states and union territories by Human Development Index as of 2018.Trends by UNDP reports
Human Development Index of Indian states since 1990.State | HDI 1990 | HDI 1995 | HDI 2000 | HDI 2005 | HDI 2010 | HDI 2015 | HDI 2018 |
Northern India | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Chandigarh | 0.633 | 0.641 | 0.638 | 0.663 | 0.648 | 0.734 | 0.775 |
New Delhi | 0.577 | 0.620 | 0.664 | 0.690 | 0.709 | 0.730 | 0.746 |
Haryana | 0.467 | 0.506 | 0.549 | 0.591 | 0.634 | 0.686 | 0.708 |
Himachal Pradesh | 0.479 | 0.530 | 0.589 | 0.644 | 0.667 | 0.704 | 0.725 |
Jammu and Kashmir | 0.493 | 0.511 | 0.528 | 0.587 | 0.640 | 0.674 | 0.688 |
Madhya Pradesh | 0.406 | 0.433 | 0.460 | 0.501 | 0.538 | 0.585 | 0.606 |
Punjab | 0.496 | 0.536 | 0.578 | 0.615 | 0.657 | 0.703 | 0.723 |
Uttar Pradesh | 0.397 | 0.429 | 0.463 | 0.504 | 0.535 | 0.577 | 0.596 |
Uttarakhand | 0.629 | 0.635 | 0.630 | 0.656 | 0.641 | 0.664 | 0.684 |
Western India | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Dadra and Nagar Haveli | 0.672 | 0.683 | 0.684 | 0.709 | 0.696 | 0.663 | 0.663 |
Daman and Diu | 0.651 | 0.662 | 0.664 | 0.688 | 0.677 | 0.690 | 0.708 |
Goa | 0.552 | 0.581 | 0.614 | 0.671 | 0.737 | 0.754 | 0.761 |
Gujarat | 0.470 | 0.498 | 0.527 | 0.573 | 0.606 | 0.651 | 0.672 |
Maharashtra | 0.493 | 0.525 | 0.558 | 0.602 | 0.644 | 0.680 | 0.696 |
Rajasthan | 0.403 | 0.436 | 0.469 | 0.510 | 0.548 | 0.605 | 0.629 |
Eastern India | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Andaman and Nicobar Islands | 0.683 | 0.693 | 0.694 | 0.720 | 0.707 | 0.721 | 0.739 |
West Bengal | 0.440 | 0.473 | 0.505 | 0.539 | 0.572 | 0.619 | 0.641 |
Bihar | 0.378 | 0.407 | 0.436 | 0.470 | 0.514 | 0.557 | 0.576 |
Chhattisgarh | 0.562 | 0.569 | 0.564 | 0.588 | 0.574 | 0.594 | 0.613 |
Jharkhand | 0.562 | 0.568 | 0.564 | 0.588 | 0.574 | 0.584 | 0.599 |
Odisha | 0.400 | 0.429 | 0.458 | 0.494 | 0.535 | 0.585 | 0.606 |
Northeastern India | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Assam | 0.411 | 0.447 | 0.488 | 0.531 | 0.567 | 0.598 | 0.614 |
Arunachal Pradesh | 0.437 | 0.471 | 0.502 | 0.535 | 0.641 | 0.661 | 0.660 |
Manipur | 0.495 | 0.526 | 0.559 | 0.598 | 0.681 | 0.694 | 0.696 |
Meghalaya | 0.456 | 0.469 | 0.477 | 0.533 | 0.620 | 0.648 | 0.656 |
Mizoram | 0.525 | 0.547 | 0.569 | 0.630 | 0.686 | 0.698 | 0.705 |
Nagaland | 0.531 | 0.533 | 0.522 | 0.557 | 0.661 | 0.679 | 0.679 |
Sikkim | 0.541 | 0.548 | 0.548 | 0.590 | 0.633 | 0.691 | 0.716 |
Tripura | 0.447 | 0.488 | 0.531 | 0.561 | 0.608 | 0.643 | 0.658 |
Southern India | - | - | - | - | - | - | - |
Andhra Pradesh | 0.424 | 0.450 | 0.478 | 0.530 | 0.580 | 0.629 | 0.650 |
Karnataka | 0.444 | 0.479 | 0.518 | 0.565 | 0.605 | 0.659 | 0.682 |
Kerala | 0.544 | 0.568 | 0.598 | 0.678 | 0.714 | 0.757 | 0.779 |
Lakshadweep | 0.693 | 0.704 | 0.705 | 0.731 | 0.717 | 0.732 | 0.750 |
Puducherry | 0.717 | 0.730 | 0.730 | 0.757 | 0.743 | 0.730 | 0.738 |
Tamil Nadu | 0.471 | 0.504 | 0.542 | 0.599 | 0.646 | 0.689 | 0.708 |
Telangana | 0.622 | 0.630 | 0.627 | 0.652 | 0.638 | 0.651 | 0.669 |
India | 0.431 | 0.463 | 0.498 | 0.539 | 0.582 | 0.627 | 0.647 |
Trend analysis by Indian National Development Reports
Compared with the previous Indian National Human Development Reports and the latest state-level government statistical report, India has significantly improved its HDI in all of its administrative subdivisions:This is a list of Indian states by their respective Human Development Index, as of 2008. Kerala stands first in Human Development Index among the states in India.
Consumption-based HDI
There are many ways to calculate HDI, and its calculation is sensitive to base data and assumptions. Using another approach, UNDP India and Government of India calculated the HDI nationwide average to be 0.605 in 2006. This data was published by the Indian Government. Note that the 2007-2008 HDI values in the table below is not based on income as is the UNDP standard practice for global comparisons, but on estimated consumption expenditure – an assumption which underestimates the HDI than actual. Further, data was unavailable for the following states and union territories: Chandigarh, Lakshadweep, Andaman and Nicobar Islands, Daman and Diu, Puducherry, and Dadra and Nagar Haveli.Rank | State/Union Territory | consumption based HDI |
1 | Kerala | 0.790 |
2 | Delhi | 0.750 |
3 | Himachal Pradesh | 0.652 |
4 | Goa | 0.617 |
5 | Punjab | 0.605 |
6 | Northeast India | 0.573 |
7 | Maharashtra | 0.572 |
8 | Tamil Nadu | 0.570 |
9 | Haryana | 0.552 |
10 | Jammu and Kashmir | 0.542 |
11 | Gujarat | 0.527 |
12 | Karnataka | 0.519 |
National average | 0.513 | |
13 | West Bengal | 0.492 |
14 | Uttarakhand | 0.490 |
15 | Andhra Pradesh | 0.473 |
16 | Assam | 0.444 |
17 | Rajasthan | 0.434 |
18 | Uttar Pradesh | 0.380 |
19 | Jharkhand | 0.376 |
20 | Madhya Pradesh | 0.375 |
21 | Bihar | 0.367 |
22 | Odisha | 0.362 |
23 | Chhattisgarh | 0.358 |