Likelihood ratios in diagnostic testing
In evidence-based medicine, likelihood ratios are used for assessing the value of performing a diagnostic test. They use the sensitivity and specificity of the test to determine whether a test result usefully changes the probability that a condition exists. The first description of the use of likelihood ratios for decision rules was made at a symposium on information theory in 1954. In medicine, likelihood ratios were introduced between 1975 and 1980.
Calculation
Two versions of the likelihood ratio exist, one for positive and one for negative test results. Respectively, they are known as the ' and '.The positive likelihood ratio is calculated as
which is equivalent to
or "the probability of a person who has the disease testing positive divided by the probability of a person who does not have the disease testing positive."
Here "T+" or "T−" denote that the result of the test is positive or negative, respectively. Likewise, "D+" or "D−" denote that the disease is present or absent, respectively. So "true positives" are those that test positive and have the disease, and "false positives" are those that test positive but do not have the disease.
The greater the value of the LR+ for a particular test, the more likely a positive test result is a true positive. On the other hand, an LR+ < 1 would imply that non-diseased individuals are more likely than diseased individuals to receive positive test results.
The negative likelihood ratio is calculated as
which is equivalent to
or "the probability of a person who has the disease testing negative divided by the probability of a person who does not have the disease testing negative."
The calculation of likelihood ratios for tests with continuous values or more than two outcomes is similar to the calculation for dichotomous outcomes; a separate likelihood ratio is simply calculated for every level of test result and is called interval or stratum specific likelihood ratios.
The pretest odds of a particular diagnosis, multiplied by the likelihood ratio, determines the post-test odds. This calculation is based on Bayes' theorem.
Application to medicine
A likelihood ratio of greater than 1 indicates the test result is associated with the disease. A likelihood ratio less than 1 indicates that the result is associated with absence of the disease.Tests where the likelihood ratios lie close to 1 have little practical significance as the post-test probability is little different from the pre-test probability. In summary, the pre-test probability refers to the chance that an individual has a disorder or condition prior to the use of a diagnostic test. It allows the clinician to better interpret the results of the diagnostic test and helps to predict the likelihood of a true positive result.
Research suggests that physicians rarely make these calculations in practice, however, and when they do, they often make errors. A randomized controlled trial compared how well physicians interpreted diagnostic tests that were presented as either sensitivity and specificity, a likelihood ratio, or an inexact graphic of the likelihood ratio, found no difference between the three modes in interpretation of test results.
Estimation table
This table provide examples of how changes in the likelihood ratio affects post-test probability of disease.Likelihood ratio | Approximate* change in probability | Effect on posttest Probability of disease |
Values between 0 and 1 decrease the probability of disease | ||
0.1 | −45% | Large decrease |
0.2 | −30% | Moderate decrease |
0.5 | −15% | Slight decrease |
1 | −0% | - |
Values greater than 1 increase the probability of disease | ||
1 | +0% | - |
2 | +15% | Slight increase |
5 | +30% | Moderate increase |
10 | +45% | Large increase |
Estimation example
- Pre-test probability: For example, if about 2 out of every 5 patients with abdominal distension have ascites, then the pretest probability is 40%.
- Likelihood Ratio: An example "test" is that the physical exam finding of bulging flanks has a positive likelihood ratio of 2.0 for ascites.
- Estimated change in probability: Based on table above, a likelihood ratio of 2.0 corresponds to an approximately +15% increase in probability.
- Final probability: Therefore, bulging flanks increases the probability of ascites from 40% to about 55%.
Calculation example
Some sources distinguish between LR+ and LR−. A worked example is shown below.
Confidence intervals for all the predictive parameters involved can be calculated, giving the range of values within which the true value lies at a given confidence level.
Estimation of pre- and post-test probability
The likelihood ratio of a test provides a way to estimate the pre- and post-test probabilities of having a condition.With pre-test probability and likelihood ratio given, then, the post-test probabilities can be calculated by the following three steps:
In equation above, positive post-test probability is calculated using the likelihood ratio positive, and the negative post-test probability is calculated using the likelihood ratio negative.
Odds are converted to probabilities as follows:
multiply equation by
add to equation
divide equation by
hence
- Posttest probability = Posttest odds /
- P' = P0 × LR/, where P0 is the pre-test probability, P' is the post-test probability, and LR is the likelihood ratio. This formula can be calculated algebraically by combining the steps in the preceding description.
Example
Taking the medical example from above, the positive pre-test probability is calculated as:- Pretest probability = / 2030 = 0.0148
- Pretest odds = 0.0148 / =0.015
- Posttest odds = 0.015 × 7.4 = 0.111
- Posttest probability = 0.111 / = 0.1 or 10%