IBTS Greenhouse


The IBTS-Greenhouse is a biotectural, urban development project suited for hot arid deserts.
It was part of the Egyptian strategy for the afforestation of desert lands from 2011 until spring of 2015, when geopolitical changes like the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant – Sinai Province in Egypt forced the project to a halt.
The project begun in spring 2007 as an academic study in urban development and desert greening. It was further developed by N.Berdellé and D.Voelker as a private project until 2011.
Afterwards LivingDesert Group including Prof. Abdel Ghany El Gindy and Dr. Mosaad Kotb from the Central Laboratory for Agricultural Climate in Egypt, Forestry Scientist Hany El-Kateb, Agroecologist Wil van Eijsden and Permacultureist Sepp Holzer was created to introduce the finished project in Egypt.
The IBTS Greenhouse, together with the programme for the afforestation of desert lands in Egypt, became part of relocation strategies. These play a crucial role in Egypt as urbanization of the Nile Delta is a problem for the agricultural sector and because of infrastructural problems like traffic congestion in Cairo.
The IBTS relies on a new quality of systems integration including architectural, technological and natural elements.
It combines food production and residence, as well as desalination of sea water, or brackish groundwater.
A CAE demonstration project using real weather-, soil and economic conditions proved feasibility under hyperarid conditions.
The relevance of the IBTS is its water desalination methodology with an efficiency of 0.45kwh per cubic metre of distillate.
Desalination, as one of the most important key-technologies of the 21st century, has thus become financially and ecologically viable for large scale agriculture, forestry and aquaculture.
The building has its roots in construction engineering and construction physics in contrast to food production as it is for most greenhouses. It is fundamentally different from the seawater greenhouses.
Much more so it differs for its performance in desalination. Without exception, alternative desalination-technologies, air-to-water utilities and desalination-greenhouses in testing, require a multiple of the energy for fresh-water production, as is the current efficiency record in the industry.
The significance of the term Integration lies within the efficiency that only systems integration can achieve.
Particular importance lies on the imitation of natural systems, especially closed cycles. The establishment of closed watercycles being the most crucial of all, because of the increasing severeness of the Global Water crisis particularly in hot desert climates.
The desalination feature in the current version is bound to hot climates because it requires high amounts of solar thermal power. It has turned out to be very suitable in mitigation of the sinking of water tables in agricultural areas of the MENA region and beyond.
In future versions the IBTS can be deployed in cold climates using extra heat energy sources like from compact fusion, or small modular reactors.

Performance

The energy of operation is 0.45 kWh per cubic metre of distilled water in the full scale version.
This performance is more than 10 times lower than the records set by desalination plants in Dubai and Perth according to official numbers given by the respective authorities.
The IBTS is based on a modular concept, with a core size of 1 hectare. This is the minimum size for the construction and for self-sufficiency, but the circular, architectural modules can be built 10 hectare large, or more. Each module is based on sub-modules allowing for immediate commencement of operation and generation of profit. Best efficiency and full capacity can be provided with a superstructure approximately 100 modules large. 10 km² have the capacity of an industrial desalination plant, which is 0,5 million cubic meters of water per day.
Since the first version of the IBTS the atmospheric water generation has evolved through a series of models and can now be operated at 0.45 kwh/m³ according to the developer.
The IBTS works with natural processes in closed cycles, hosted in a building. Therefore it never hits natural, or physical limitations for growth like the desalination technology in the Persian Gulf already has because of brine discharge and temperature rise.

Primary energy

Important for understanding the performance of the IBTS is the fact that it is operated with electrical and thermal energy produced from windpower and concentrated solar power, on-site. This means that the energy requirement and the use of primary energy can be considered the same, which is not the case for common desalination plants.
Common desalination plants are dependent on power-plants using fossil fuels. Accounting for energy-loss during the energy transformation in the power-plant, common desalination plants use 2-3 times more energy than stated in the usual performance data. These are common factors for energy-conversion losses for the combustion engines used in the desalination industry.
Taking this into account the IBTS uses less than 5% of the current efficiency world-record, which about 3.5kWh/m³ plus ca. 1.0kWh/m³ for seawater pumping and other factors not accounted for. This is multiplied with the efficiency of primary energy use. Together 9-14 kWh/m³. See primary energy
The economic reality behind these numbers looks even worse for common desalination plants because energy-loss occurs during many stages Upstream, like drilling, transportation or the manufacturing of required machines. Some of this does not have to be considered for solar-power, because it is free and infinite. Relevant for solar-power is only "power installation per investment unit" not the efficiency of primary energy use.
The term of primary energy should be combined with energy quality for realistic understanding. Energy quality in context of desalination shows a new picture for the overall efficiency not only of the physical process of desalination, but the overall economic efficiency of the IBTS using proprietary renewable energy.

Economic implications

Because of the independence of primary energy- and material resources, the efficiency of water production and the scalable, modular design the IBTS Greenhouse is a blueprint for a new economy which is sustainable. A strategic, national infrastructure project like the IBTS allows for the successful energy-transition into a sustainable economy. This can be understood by a comparison of GDP growth, the generation of real values and a weihted GDP.
An example for the infrastructure services of the IBTS Greenhouse is water purification. Wastewater is percolated into the ground and provides water and nutrients for the growth of trees. This is not so easy with food crops for hygenic reasons. Thus the IBTS provides sewage treatment in countries, or areas that lack treatment plants
Another economic impact is that the IBTS Greenhouse is not steering down a dead end road like technologies based on fossil fuels and centralized production which created "stranded assets" according to leading economic analyst Jeremy Rifkin. The IBTS Greenhouse is an open concept compatible with most other technologies and practices for water- energy- and food production. It is also "future-ready" for upcoming technologies like nuclear power from compact fusion, the traveling wave reactor, or breeder reactors. When these energy sources become available they can be plugged into existing IBTS infrastructure and generate even more fresh water without brine discharge into natural water bodies and the appending environmental problems.
The manufacturing process of the IBTS is designed for automation, which requires more electricity than common construction sites, or manufacturing processes. This platform design is also future ready for more available energy. An example is the large roof of the IBTS, which needs to be observed and cleaned continuously and refurbished several times over the lifecycle of the IBTS. This can only be done by special bots, or drones on the scale that the IBTS was developed for as national desert greening strategy for reclaiming and regreening entire regions.

Examples of other Biotecture

The most famous example is the Biosphere 2, a research project and demonstration site integrating residential areas into a new type of greenhouse. It was designed to be self-sufficient including food production in an ecosystemic context.
Another example for Biotecture, which is foremost a residential home, is an Earthship. Earthships incorporate water-purification and reuse on multiple levels.
Since 2010 urban developments labeled Forest Cities, drawing from the IBTS and other pioneer projects have been created. The Gardens by the Bay using all of the core design elements of the TSPC Forest City from 2008 like artificial trees with spherical buildings on top is an outstanding example. The Liuzhou Forest City is one of many examples for green architecture, respectively green urban developments of new cities with a lot of green areas, including the facades of buildings.
The international efforts to create Forest Cities are another level of implication. China is going forward with the introduction of several hundred designated Forest Cities.. One of the latest examples is Shenzhen