Haplogroup J-M267
In genetic genealogy and human genetics, Y DNA haplogroup J-M267, also commonly known as haplogroup J1, is a subclade of Y-DNA haplogroup J-P209 along with its sibling clade Y DNA haplogroup J-M172.
Men from this lineage share a common paternal ancestor, which is demonstrated and defined by the presence of the single nucleotide polymorphism mutation referred to as M267, which was announced in. This haplogroup is found today in significant frequencies in many areas in or near the Arabian Peninsula and Western Asia. Out of its native Asian Continent, it's found at very high frequencies in Sudan. It's also found at lesser extent in parts of the Caucasus, Ethiopia and parts of North Africa and amongst Jewish groups, especially those with Cohen surnames. It can also be found much less commonly, but still occasionally in significant amounts, in parts of southern Europe and as far east as Central Asia and the Indian Subcontinent.
Origins
Since the discovery of haplogroup J-P209 it has generally been recognized that it shows signs of having originated in or near West Asia. The frequency and diversity of both its major branches, J-M267 and J-M172, in that region makes them candidates as genetic markers of the spread of farming technology during the Neolithic, which is proposed to have had a major impact upon human populations.J-M267 has several recognized subclades, some of which were recognized before J-M267 itself was recognized, for example J-M62. With one notable exception, J-P58, most of these are not common. Because of the dominance of J-P58 in J-M267 populations in many areas, discussion of J-M267's origins require a discussion of J-P58 at the same time.
Distribution
Africa
North Africa and Horn of Africa
North Africa received Semitic migrations, according to some studies it may have been diffused in recent time by Arabs who, mainly from the 7th century a.d., expanded to northern Africa. However the Canary islands is not known to have had any Semitic language. In North Africa J-M267 is dominated by J-P58, and dispersed in a very uneven manner according to studies so far, often but not always being lower among Berber and/or non-urban populations. In Ethiopia there are signs of older movements of J-M267 into Africa across the Red Sea, not only in the J-P58 form. This also appears to be associated with Semitic languages. According to a study in 2011, in Tunisia, J-M267 is significantly more abundant in the urban than in the rural total population. According to the authors, these results could be explained by supposing that Arabization in Tunisia was a military enterprise, therefore, mainly driven by men that displaced native Berbers to geographically marginal areas but they frequently married Berber women.| Population | Sample size | J* | total J-M267 | J-M267 | J-P58 | publication | previous research on same samples |
| Algeria | 102 | NA | 22.5% | NA | NA | ||
| Algeria | 20 | NA | 35% | NA | NA | ||
| Egypt | 147 | NA | 21.1% | 1.4% | 19.7% | ||
| Egypt | 124 | NA | 19.8% | NA | NA | ||
| Egypt | 35 | NA | 31.4% | NA | NA | ||
| Libya | 47 | NA | 0.0% | NA | NA | ||
| Libya | 238 | NA | 39.5% | NA | NA | Alvarez 2014 | Elmrghni 2012 |
| Morocco | 33 | NA | 0% | NA | NA | ||
| Morocco | 221 | NA | 5% | NA | NA | Fregel et al. | |
| Morocco | 49 | NA | 10.2% | NA | NA | ||
| Morocco | 44 | NA | 13.6% | NA | NA | ||
| Morocco | 64 | NA | 6.3% | NA | NA | ||
| Morocco | 103 | NA | 7.8% | NA | NA | ||
| Morocco | 267 | NA | 21.3% | NA | NA | Alvarez 2014 | Aboukhalid 2010 |
| Morocco | 166 | NA | 15.7% | NA | NA | Alvarez 2014 | Laouina 2011 |
| Morocco | 96 | NA | 29.2% | NA | NA | Alvarez 2014 | Palet 2010 |
| Morocco | 49 | NA | 8.2% | NA | NA | Alvarez 2014 | |
| Morocco | 108 | NA | 16.7% | 0.0% | 16.7% | Regueiro 2015 | |
| Tunisia | 73 | NA | 30.1% | NA | NA | ||
| Tunisia | 601 | Na | 16.64% | NA | NA | Pestano J, et al. | |
| Tunisia | 220 | NA | 25.9% | 0.0% | 25.9% | Fadhlaoui-Zid 2015 | |
| Tunisia | 148 | NA | 32.4% | 1.3% | 31.1% | ||
| Tunisia | 52 | NA | 34.6% | NA | NA | ||
| Tunisia | 40 | NA | 0% | NA | NA | ||
| Tunisia | 40 | NA | 5% | 0% | 5% | ||
| Tunisia | 46 | NA | 8.7% | NA | NA | ||
| Tunisia | 47 | NA | 0% | NA | NA | ||
| Tunisia | 35 | NA | 31.4% | 0% | 31.4% | ||
| Tunisia | 32 | NA | 43.8% | 0% | 43.8% | ||
| Tunisia | 33 | NA | 24.2 | 0% | 24.2% | ||
| Tunisia | 47 | NA | 34.0% | NA | NA | Alvarez 2014 | Frigi 2011 |
| Tunisia | 56 | NA | 25% | 0.0% | 25% | Regueiro 2015 | |
| Tunisia | 72 | NA | 15.3% | 0.0% | 15.3% | Regueiro 2015 | |
| Canary Islands | 30 | NA | 16.7% | NA | NA | ||
| Canary Islands | 42 | NA | 11.9% | NA | NA | ||
| Canary Islands | 652 | NA | 3.5% | NA | NA | ||
| Sahrawi | 89 | NA | 20.2% | NA | NA | and | |
| Sudan | 35 | NA | 74.3% | 0.0% | 74.3% | and | |
| Sudan-Arabic | 35 | NA | 17.1% | 0.0% | 17.1% | ||
| Sudan | 61 | NA | 4.9% | 3.3% | 1.6% | ||
| Ethiopia Oromo | 78 | NA | 2.6% | 2.6% | 0.0% | ||
| Ethiopia Amhara | 48 | NA | 29.2% | 8.3% | 20.8% | ||
| Ethiopia Arsi | 85 | 22% | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Ethiopia General | 95 | 21% | NA | NA | NA | ||
| Comoros Islands | 293 | NA | 5.0% | NA | NA | ||
| Somalis | 201 | 0.5 | 2.5 -3% | NA | 2.5% | J-P58 might be 5% in upcoming study |
Asia
South Asia
J* was found in India among Indian Muslims.| Population | Sample size | J* | total J-M267 | J-M267 | J-P58 | Publication |
| India | 161 | 10.6% | NA | NA | NA | |
| India | 129 | 2.3% | NA | NA | NA | |
| India | 40 | 10% | NA | NA | NA |
West Asia
The area including eastern Turkey and the Zagros and Taurus mountains, has been identified as a likely area of ancient J-M267 diversity. Both J-P58 and other types of J-M267 are present, sometimes with similar frequencies.| Population | Sample size | Total J-M267 | J-M267 | J-P58 | Publication | Previous research on same samples |
| Turkey | 523 | 9.0% | 3.1% | 5.9% | ||
| Iran | 150 | 11.3% | 2.7% | 8.7% | ||
| Kurds Iraq | 93 | 11.8% | 4.3% | 7.5% | ||
| Assyrians modern Iraq | 28 | 28.6% | 17.9% | 10.7% | ||
| Iraq Arabs | 56 | 64.1% | 1.8% | 62.3% | ||
| Assyrians Iran | 31 | 16.1% | 9.7% | 6.5% | ||
| Iran | 92 | 3.2% | NA | NA | ||
| Assyrians Turkey | 25 | 20.0% | 16.0% | 4.0% |
Levant and Semitic populations
J-M267 is very common throughout this region, dominated by J-P58, but some specific sub-populations have notably low frequencies.| Population | Sample size | Total J-M267 | J-M267 | J-P58 | Publication | Previous research on same samples |
| Syria | 554 | 33.6% | NA | NA | ||
| Druzes | 34 | 14.7% | 2.9% | 11.8% | ||
| Syria | 36 | 47.2% | 2.8% | 44.4% | ||
| Syria | 44 | 6.8% | 4.5% | 2.3% | ||
| Syria | 14 | 14.3% | 0.0% | 14.3% | ||
| Syriac Catholic Damascus | 42 | 9.5% | 0.0% | 9.5% | ||
| Alawites Syria | 45 | 26.7% | 0.0% | 26.7% | ||
| Assyrian NE Syria | 30 | 3.3% | 0.0% | 3.3% | ||
| Ismaili Damascus | 51 | 58.8% | 0.0% | 58.8% | ||
| Lebanon | 951 | 25% | NA | NA | ||
| Galilee Druze | 172 | 13.4% | 1.2% | 12.2% | ||
| Palestinians | 101 | 39.2% | NA | NA | ||
| Palestinian | 49 | 32.7% | 0.0% | 32.7% | ||
| Jordan | 76 | 48.7% | 0.0% | 48.7% | ||
| Jordan | 273 | 35.5% | NA | NA | ||
| Jordan | 101 | 40.6% | NA | NA | ||
| Jordan | 45 | 8.9% | NA | NA | ||
| Jews | 57 | 12.3% | NA | NA | ||
| Jews | 215 | 46.0% | 0.0% | 46.0% | ||
| Ashkenazi Jews | 1,360 | 14.9% | 0.9% | 14.0% | ||
| Bedouin Negev | 28 | 67.9% | 3.6% | 64.3% |
Arabian peninsula
J-P58 is the most common Y-Chromosome haplogroup among men from all of this region.| Population | Sample size | Total J-M267 | J-M267 | J-P58 | Publication | Previous research on same samples |
| Saudi Arabia | 157 | 40.1% | NA | NA | ||
| Qatar | 72 | 58.3% | 1.4% | 56.9% | ||
| UAE | 164 | 34.8% | 0.0% | 34.8% | ||
| Yemen | 62 | 72.6% | 4.8% | 67.7% | ||
| Kuwait | 42 | 33.3% | NA | NA | ||
| Oman | 121 | 38.0% | 0.8% | 37.2% |
Europe
J-M267 is uncommon in most of Northern and Central Europe. It is, however, found in significant pockets at levels of 5–10% among many populations in southern Europe.| Population | Sample size | Total J-M267 | J-M267 | J-P58 | publication |
| Albania | 56 | 3.6% = 2/56 | NA | NA | |
| Republic of Macedonia Albanian speakers | 64 | 6.3% = 4/64 | NA | NA | |
| Malta | 90 | 7.8% | NA | NA | |
| Crete | 193 | 8.3% = 16/193 | NA | NA | |
| Greece | 171 | 4.7% = 8/171 | NA | NA | |
| Macedonia | 56 | 1.8% = 1/56 | NA | NA | |
| Greece | 249 | 1.6% = 4/249 | NA | NA | |
| Bulgaria | 808 | 3.4% | NA | NA | |
| Romania | 130 | 1.5% | NA | NA | |
| Russia | 223 | 0.4% | NA | NA | |
| Croats | 29 | 0% | NA | NA | |
| Slovenia | 75 | 1.3% | NA | NA | |
| Italians | 67 | 0% | NA | NA | |
| Italians | 915 | 0.7% | NA | NA | |
| Sicily | 236 | 3.8% | NA | NA | |
| Provence | 51 | 2% | NA | NA | |
| Portugal | 101 | 1% | NA | NA | |
| Portugal | 102 | 4.9% | NA | NA | |
| Portugal | 100 | 7% | NA | NA | |
| Açores | 121 | 2.5% | NA | NA | |
| Madeira | 129 | 0% | NA | NA |
Caucasus
The Caucasus has areas of both high and low J-M267 frequency. The J-M267 in the Caucasus is also notable because most of it is not within the J-P58 subclade.| Population | Sample size | Total J-M267 | J-M267 | J-P58 | Publication |
| Avars | 115 | 59% | 58% | 1% | |
| Dargins | 101 | 70% | 69% | 1% | |
| Kubachi | 65 | 99% | 99% | 0% | |
| Kaitak | 33 | 85% | 85% | 0% | |
| Lezghins | 81 | 44.4% | 44.4% | 0% | |
| Shapsug | 100 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| Abkhaz | 58 | 0% | 0% | 0% | |
| Circassians | 142 | 11.9% | 4.9% | 7% | |
| Ingush | 143 | 2.8% | 2.8% | 0% | |
| Ossetians | 357 | 1.3% | 1.3% | 0.0% | |
| Chechens | 112 | 21% | 21% | 0% | |
| Chechens | 118 | 25% | 25% | 0% | |
| Chechens | 100 | 16% | 16% | 0% | |
| Azerbaijan | 46 | 15.2% | NA | NA |
Subclade Distribution
J-P58
The P58 marker which defines subgroup J1c3 was announced in, but had been announced earlier under the name Page08 in. It is very prevalent in many areas where J-M267 is common, especially in parts of North Africa and throughout the Arabian peninsula. It also makes up approximately 70% of the J-M267 among the Amhara of Ethiopia. Notably, it is not common among the J-M267 of the Caucasus.proposed that J-P58 might have first dispersed during the Pre-Pottery Neolithic B period, "from a geographical zone, including northeast Syria, northern Iraq and eastern Turkey toward Mediterranean Anatolia, Ismaili from southern Syria, Jordan, Palestine and northern Egypt." They further propose that the Zarzian material culture may be ancestral. They also propose that this movement of people may also be linked to the dispersal of Semitic languages by hunter-herders, who moved into arid areas during periods known to have had low rainfall. Thus, while other haplogroups including J-M267 moved out of the area with agriculturalists who followed the rainfall, populations carrying J-M267 remained with their flocks.
According to this scenario, after the initial neolithic expansion involving Semitic languages, which possibly reached as far as Yemen, a more recent dispersal occurred during the Chalcolithic or Early Bronze Age, and this involved the branch of Semitic which leads to the Arabic language. The authors propose that this involved a spread of some J-P58 from the direction of Syria towards Arab populations of the Arabian Peninsula and Negev.
On the other hand, the authors agree that later waves of dispersion in and around this area have also had complex effects upon the distributions of some types of J-P58 in some regions. They list three regions which are particularly important to their proposal:
- The Levant. In this area, note a "patchy distribution of J1c3 or J-P58 frequency" which is difficult to interpret, and which "may reflect the complex demographic dynamics of religion and ethnicity in the region".
- The Eastern Anatolia, northern Iraq and western Iran. In this area, recognize signs that J-M267 might have an older presence, and on balance they accept the evidence but note that it could be in error.
- The southern area of Oman, Yemen and Ethiopia. In this area, recognize similar signs, but reject it as possibly a result of "either sampling variability and/or demographic complexity associated with multiple founders and multiple migrations."
The "YCAII=22-22 and DYS388≥15" cluster
This relatively young cluster, compared to J-M267 overall, was identified by STR markers haplotypes - specifically YCAII as 22-22, and DYS388 having unusual repeat values of 15 or higher, instead of more typical 13 This cluster was found to be relevant in some well-publicized studies of Jewish and Palestinian populations. More generally, since then this cluster has been found to be frequent among men in the Middle East and North Africa, but less frequent in areas of Ethiopia and Europe where J-M267 is nevertheless common. The genetical pattern is therefore similar to the pattern of J-P58 generally, described above, and may be caused by the same movements/migration of people.
refers to this overall cluster with YCAII=22-22 and high DYS388 values as an "Arabic" as opposed to a "Eurasian" type of J-M267. This Arabic type includes Arabic speakers from Maghreb, Sudan, Iraq and Qatar, and it is a relatively homogeneous group, implying that it might have dispersed relatively recently compared to J-M267 generally. The more diverse "Eurasian" group includes Europeans, Kurds, Iranians and Ethiopians, and is much more diverse. The authors also say that "Omanis show a mix of Eurasian pool-like and typical Arabic haplotypes as expected, considering the role of corridor played at different times by the Gulf of Oman in the dispersal of Asian and East African genes." also noted the anomalously high apparent age of Omani J-M267 when looking more generally at J-P58 and J-M267 more generally.
This cluster in turn contains three well-known related sub-clusters. First, it contains the majority of the Jewish "Cohen modal haplotype", found among Jewish populations, but especially in men with surnames related to Cohen. It also contains the "Galilee modal haplotype" and "Palestinian & Israeli Arab modal haplotype", both of which are associated with Palestinian/Israeli Arabs by and. then pointed out that the GMH is also the most frequent type of J-P209 haplotype found in north-west Africans and Yemenis, so it is not restricted to Israel and Palestine. However, this particular variant "is absent" from two particular "non-Arab Middle Eastern populations", namely "Jews and Muslim Kurds". noted not only the presence of the GMH in the Maghreb but also that J-M267 in this region had very little diversity. They concluded that J-M267 in this region is a result of two distinct migration events: "early Neolithic dispersion" and "expansions from the Arabian peninsula" during the 7th century. later agreed that this seemed consistent with the evidence and generalized from this that distribution of the entire YCAII=22-22 cluster of J-M267 in the Arabic-speaking areas of the Middle East and North Africa might in fact mainly have an origin in historical times.
More recent studies have emphasized doubt that the Islamic expansions are old enough to completely explain the major patterns of J-M267 frequencies. rejected this for J-P58 as a whole, but accepted that "some of the populations with low diversity, such as Bedouins from Israel, Qatar, Sudan and UAE, are tightly clustered near high-frequency haplotypes suggesting founder effects with star burst expansion in the Arabian Desert". They did not comment on the Maghreb.
take a stronger position of rejecting any strong correlation between the Arab expansion and either the YCAII=22-22 STR-defined sub-cluster as discussed by or the smaller "Galilee modal haplotype" as discussed by. They also estimate that the Cohen modal haplotype must be older than 4500 years old, and maybe as much as 8600 years old - well before the supposed origin of the Cohanim. Only the so-called Palestinian & Israeli Arab modal had a strong correlation to an ethnic group, but it was also rare. In conclusion, the authors were negative about the usefulness of STR defined modals for any "forensic or genealogical purposes" because "they were found across ethnic groups with different cultural or geographic affiliation".
disagreed, at least concerning the Cohen modal haplotype. They said that it was necessary to look at a more detailed STR haplotype in order to define a new "Extended Cohen Modal Haplotype" which is extremely rare outside Jewish populations, and even within Jewish populations is mainly only found in Cohanim. They also said that by using more markers and a more restrictive definition, the estimated age of the Cohanim lineage is lower than the estimates of, and it is consistent with a common ancestor at the approximate time of founding of the priesthood which is the source of Cohen surnames.
J-M368
The correspondence between P58 and high DYS388 values, and YCAII=22-22 is not perfect. For example the J-M267 subclade of J-P58 defined by SNP M368 has DYS388=13 and YCAII=19-22, like other types of J-M267 outside the "Arabic" type of J-M267, and it is therefore believed to be a relatively old offshoot of J-P58, that did not take part in the most recent waves of J-M267 expansion in the Middle East. These DYS388=13 haplotypes are most common in the Caucasus and Anatolia, but also found in Ethiopia.Phylogenetics and distribution
There are several confirmed and proposed phylogenetic trees available for haplogroup J-M267. The following phylogeny or family tree of J-M267 haplogroup subclades is based on the ISOGG tree, which is in turn based upon the YCC 2008 tree and subsequent published research.J1
- J1* J1* clusters are found in Eastern Anatolia and parts of the Caucasus.
- J1a Found at very low frequency in Britain.
- J1b Found at low frequency in Eastern Anatolia, Iran and parts of Europe.
- J1c
- * J1c* Found at low frequency in Europe.
- * J1c1
- * J1c2 Found sporadically in Anatolia, East Africa, the Arabian Peninsula and Europe.
- * J1c3
- ** J1c3* Found at low frequency in the Levant and the Arabian Peninsula.
- ** J1c3a Previously known as J1e1.
- ** J1c3b Previously known as J1e2.
- ** J1c3c Found at low frequency in South Arabia.
- ** J1c3d Accounts for the majority of J1, the predominant haplogroup in the Arabian peninsula.
- *** J1c3d* Accounts for the majority of J1 in Yemen, Cohen Jews and Ethiopia. as well as Quraysh including Seyyed.
- *** J1c3d1
- *** J1c3d2 Accounts for the majority of J1c3d in Saudi Arabia. An important element of J1c3d in North Africa.
- **** J1c3d2*
- ***** J1c3d2a
Ancient DNA
Genetics
Y-DNA J Subclades
Y-DNA Backbone Tree
Footnotes
Works Cited
Journals
- See also
- .
Websites
- Ongoing Corrections/Additions by citizen scientists.
- This is an ongoing research project by citizen scientists. Over 2300 members.
- * This is an ongoing research project by citizen scientists. Over 150 members.
- * This is an ongoing research project by citizen scientists. Over 550 members.
- * This is an ongoing research project by citizen scientists. Over 1050 members.
- * This is an ongoing research project by citizen scientists. Over 450 members.
- This is an ongoing research project by citizen scientists. Over 950 J members.
- This is an ongoing research project by citizen scientists. Over 400 members.