Federal Constitutional Court
The Federal Constitutional Court is the supreme constitutional court for the Federal Republic of Germany, established by the constitution or Basic Law of Germany. Since its inception with the beginning of the post-World War II republic, the court has been located in the city of Karlsruhe, which is also the seat of the Federal Court of Justice.
The main task of the Federal Constitutional Court is judicial review, and it may declare legislation unconstitutional, thus rendering them ineffective. In this respect, it is similar to other supreme courts with judicial review powers, yet the court possesses a number of additional powers, and is regarded as among the most interventionist and powerful national courts in the world. Unlike other supreme courts, the constitutional court is not an integral stage of the judicial or appeals process, and does not serve as a regular appellate court from lower courts or the Federal Supreme Courts on any violation of federal laws.
The court's jurisdiction is focused on constitutional issues and the compliance of all governmental institutions with the constitution. Constitutional amendments or changes passed by the Parliament are subject to its judicial review, since they have to be compatible with the most basic principles of the Grundgesetz defined by the eternity clause.
Scope
The Basic Law of the Federal Republic of Germany stipulates that all three branches of the state are bound directly by the constitution in Article 20, Section 3 of the document. As a result, the court can rule acts of any branches unconstitutional, whether as formal violations or as material conflicts.The powers of the Federal Constitutional Court are defined in article 93 of the Grundgesetz.
This constitutional norm is set out in a federal law, the Federal Constitutional Court Act, which also defines how decisions of the court on material conflicts are put into force. The Constitutional Court has therefore several strictly defined procedures in which cases may be brought before it:
- Constitutional complaint: By means of the Verfassungsbeschwerde any person may allege that his or her constitutional rights have been violated. Although only a small fraction of these are actually successful, several have resulted in major legislation being invalidated, especially in the field of taxation. The large majority of the court's procedures fall into this category; 135,968 such complaints were filed from 1957 to 2002.
- Abstract regulation control: Several political institutions, including the governments of the Bundesländer, may bring a federal law before the court if they consider it unconstitutional. A well-known example of this procedure was the 1975 abortion decision, which invalidated legislation intended to decriminalise abortion.
- Specific regulation control: Any regular court which is convinced, that a law in question for a certain case is not in conformance with the constitution must suspend that case and bring this law before the Federal Constitutional Court.
- Federal dispute: Federal institutions, including members of the Bundestag, may bring internal disputes over competences and procedures before the court.
- State–federal dispute: The Länder may bring disputes over competences and procedures between the states and federal institutions before the court.
- Investigation committee control
- Federal election scrutiny: Violations of election laws may be brought before the court by political institution or any involved voter.
- Impeachment procedure: Impeachment proceedings may be brought against the Federal President, a judge, or a member of one of the Federal Supreme Courts, by the Bundestag, the Bundesrat or the federal government, based on violation of constitutional or federal law.
- Prohibition of a political party: Article 21 of the Basic Law gives the Constitutional Court the power to ban political parties that either threaten the existence of Germany or "seek to undermine or abolish the free democratic basic order". This has happened just twice, both times in the 1950s: the Socialist Reich Party, a neo-Nazi group, was banned in 1952, and the Communist Party of Germany was banned in 1956. A 2003 attempt to ban another neo-Nazi party, the National Democratic Party of Germany, failed when it was revealed that a significant proportion of its leadership were informants for the Federal Office for the Protection of the Constitution.
Organization
The court consists of two senates, each of which has eight members, headed by a senate's chairman. The members of each senate are allocated to three chambers for hearings in constitutional complaint and single regulation control cases. Each chamber consists of three judges, so each senate chairman is at the same time a member of two chambers. The court publishes decisions on its website and since 1996 a public relations department promotes selected decisions with press releases.Decisions by a senate require a majority. In some cases a two-thirds vote is required. Decisions by a chamber need to be unanimous. A chamber is not authorized to overrule a standing precedent of the senate to which it belongs; such issues need to be submitted to the senate as a whole. Similarly, a senate may not overrule a standing precedent of the other senate, and such issues will be submitted to a plenary meeting of all 16 judges.
Unlike all other German courts, the court often publishes the vote count on its decisions and even allows its members to issue a dissenting opinion. This possibility, introduced only in 1971, is a remarkable deviation from German judicial tradition.
One of the two senate chairmen is also the President of the court, the other one being the Vice President. The presidency alternates between the two senates, i.e. the successor of a President is always chosen from the other senate. The 10th and current president of the court is Stephan Harbarth.
Democratic function
The Constitutional Court is able to actively administer the law and ensure that political and bureaucratic decisions comply with the rights of the individual enshrined in the Basic Law. Specifically, it can vet the democratic and constitutional legitimacy of bills proposed by federal or state government, scrutinise decisions by the administration, arbitrate disputes over the implementation of law between states and the federal government, and ban non-democratic political parties. The Constitutional Court enjoys more public trust than the federal or state parliaments, which some say derives from the German enthusiasm for the rule of law.Appointment of judges
The court's judges are elected by the Bundestag and the Bundesrat. According to the Basic Law, each of these bodies selects four members of each senate. The election of a judge requires a two-thirds vote. The selection of the chairman of each senate alternates between Bundestag and Bundesrat and also requires a two-thirds vote.Until 2015 the Bundestag has delegated this task to a special committee, consisting of a small number of Bundestag members. This procedure has caused some constitutional concern and was considered to be unconstitutional by many scholars. In 2015 the Bundesverfassungsgerichtsgesetz was changed in this aspect, ruling that the Bundestag elects judges to the court by secret ballot in the plenum, requiring a candidate to get a two-thirds majority, that has to equal at least an absolute majority of members of the Bundestag. The Richterwahlausschuss now only has to nominate a candidate. This new procedure was applied for the first time in September 2017, when Josef Christ was elected to the first senate as the successor of Wilhelm Schluckebier.
In the Bundesrat, a chamber in which the governments of the sixteen German states are represented, a candidate currently needs at least 46 of 69 possible votes.
The judges are elected for a 12-year term, but they must retire upon reaching the age of 68. A re-election is not possible. A judge must be at least 40 years old and must be a well-trained jurist. Three out of eight members of each senate have served as a judge on one of the federal courts. Of the other five members of each senate, most judges previously served as an academic jurist at a university, as a public servant or as a lawyer. After ending their term, most judges withdraw themselves from public life. However, there are some prominent exceptions, most notably Roman Herzog, who was elected President of Germany in 1994, shortly before the end of his term as president of the court.
Current members
Presidents of the court
The court's head is the President of the Federal Constitutional Court, who chairs one of the two senates and joint sessions of the court, while the other senate is chaired by the Vice President of Federal Constitutional Court. The right to elect the President and the Vice President alternates between the Bundestag and the Bundesrat. If the President of the Federal Constitutional Court leaves office, i.e. when his or her term as judge at the court ends, the legislative body, whose turn it is to choose the President, has to elect one of the judges of the senate, of which the former President wasn't a member, with a two-thirds-majority. The same applies, if the office of Vice President falls vacant. The given legislative body is free to elect the judge it prefers, but since 1983, it was always the sitting Vice President, who was elected President.As he or she is the highest ranking representative of the judicial branch of government, the President of the Federal Constitutional Court ranks 5th in the German order of precedence.
No. | Portrait | Name | Previous Service before court appointment | Took Office | Left Office | Sen. | Vice President |
1 | Hermann Höpker-Aschoff | Member of the Bundestag | 7 September 1951 | 15 January 1954 | 1st | Rudolf Katz | |
2 | Josef Wintrich | President of the Munich Regional court of appeal | 23 March 1954 | 19 October 1958 | 1st | Rudolf Katz | |
3 | Gebhard Müller | Minister President of Baden-Württemberg | 8 January 1959 | 8 December 1971 | 1st | Rudolf Katz, Friedrich Wilhelm Wagner, Walter Seuffert | |
4 | Ernst Benda | Member of the Bundestag | 8 December 1971 | 20 December 1983 | 1st | Walter Seuffert, Wolfgang Zeidler | |
5 | Wolfgang Zeidler | President of the Federal Administrative Court | 20 December 1983 | 16 November 1987 | 2nd | Roman Herzog | |
6 | Roman Herzog | Baden-Württemberg State Minister of the Interior | 16 November 1987 | 30 June 1994 | 1st | Ernst Gottfried Mahrenholz, Jutta Limbach | |
7 | Jutta Limbach | Berlin Senator of Justice | 14 September 1994 | 10 April 2002 | 2nd | Johann Friedrich Henschel, Otto Seidl, Hans-Jürgen Papier | |
8 | Hans-Jürgen Papier | Professor for constitutional law at the LMU Munich | 10 April 2002 | 16 March 2010 | 1st | Winfried Hassemer, Andreas Voßkuhle | |
9 | Andreas Voßkuhle | Professor for political science and legal philosophy at the University of Freiburg Rector of the University of Freiburg | 16 March 2010 | 22 June 2020 | 2nd | Ferdinand Kirchhof, Stephan Harbarth | |
10 | Stephan Harbarth | Member of the Bundestag | 22 June 2020 | 1st | Doris König |
Previous judges
- Ernst Benda
- Ernst-Wolfgang Böckenförde
- Werner Böhmer
- Gabriele Britz
- Siegfried Broß
- Hans Brox
- Brun-Otto Bryde
- Udo Di Fabio
- Thomas Dieterich
- Michael Eichberger
- Wilhelm Ellinghaus
- Hans Joachim Faller
- Everhardt Franßen
- Reinhard Gaier
- Michael Gerhardt
- Karin Graßhof
- Dieter Grimm
- Karl Haager
- Evelyn Haas
- Winfried Hassemer
- Johann Friedrich Henschel
- Monika Hermanns
- Roman Herzog
- Konrad Hesse
- Martin Hirsch
- Dieter Hömig
- Hermann Höpker-Aschoff
- Christine Hohmann-Dennhardt
- Wolfgang Hoffmann-Riem
- Peter M. Huber
- Renate Jaeger
- Hans-Joachim Jentsch
- Rudolf Katz
- Dietrich Katzenstein
- Ferdinand Kirchhof
- Paul Kirchhof
- Hans Hugo Klein
- Konrad Kruis
- Jürgen Kühling
- Herbert Landau
- Gerhard Leibholz
- Jutta Limbach
- Gertrude Lübbe-Wolff
- Ernst Gottfried Mahrenholz
- Johannes Masing
- Rudolf Mellinghoff
- Gebhard Müller
- Engelbert Niebler
- Gisela Niemeyer
- Lerke Osterloh
- Hans-Jürgen Papier
- Andreas L. Paulus
- Theodor Ritterspach
- Joachim Rottmann
- Wiltraut Rupp-von Brünneck
- Erna Scheffler
- Fabian von Schlabrendorff
- Wilhelm Schluckebier
- Helga Seibert
- Otto Seidl
- Walter Seuffert
- Alfred Söllner
- Bertold Sommer
- Helmut Steinberger
- Udo Steiner
- Ernst Träger
- Andreas Voßkuhle
- Friedrich Wilhelm Wagner
- Klaus Winter
- Wolfgang Zeidler
Landmark decisions