Elizabeth Packard


Elizabeth Parsons Ware Packard, also known as E.P.W. Packard, was an American advocate for the rights of women and people accused of insanity. She is notable for being wrongfully confined and taking legal action for her wrongful confinement, which she won.

Life

Elizabeth Packard, born in Ware, Massachusetts, was the oldest of three children and the only daughter of Samuel and Lucy Ware. Samuel was a Congregational minister in the Connecticut Valley of the Ware Congregational Church from 1810 to 1826. She was able to get a quality education at the Amherst Female Seminary, where she studied French, algebra, and the new classics, thanks to the "adequate wealth" of her parents, leading her to become a well-educated and middle-class woman. Still, she first saw "visions" in 1836 and was soon hospitalized in a Worchester state hospital, but quickly recovered from the "disease."
At the insistence of her parents, Elizabeth Parsons Ware married Calvinist minister Theophilus Packard, fourteen years her senior and said to be "cold and domineering," on 21 May 1839. The couple had six children. They lived in Western Massachusetts until September 1854. At that time, the family then resided in Kankakee County, Illinois, and, for many years, appeared to have a peaceful and uneventful marriage.
But Theophilus held quite decisive religious beliefs. After many years of marriage, Elizabeth Packard outwardly questioned her husband's beliefs and began expressing opinions that were contrary to his. While the main subject of their dispute was religion, the couple also disagreed on child rearing, family finances, and the issue of slavery, with Elizabeth defending John Brown in the "presence of rich, pro-slavery practioners" which embarrassed Theophilus. She also worked as a teacher in Jacksonville, Illinois.
When Illinois opened its first hospital for the mentally ill in 1851, the state legislature passed a law that within two years of its passage was amended to require a public hearing before a person could be committed against his or her will. There was one exception, however: a husband could have his wife committed without either a public hearing or her consent. In 1860, Theophilus Packard judged that his wife was "slightly insane", a condition he attributed to "excessive application of body and mind." He arranged for a doctor, J.W. Brown, to speak with her. The doctor pretended to be a sewing machine salesman. During their conversation, Elizabeth complained of her husband's domination and his accusations to others that she was insane. Dr. Brown reported this conversation to Theophilus. Theophilus decided to have Elizabeth committed. She learned of this decision on June 18, 1860, when the county sheriff arrived at the Packard home to take her into custody. Some say that Elizabeth was like other women whom were placed in mental institutions, from 1850 to 1900 whom were behaving in ways that "male society did not agree."
Elizabeth Packard spent the next three years at the Jacksonville Insane Asylum in Jacksonville, IL. She was regularly questioned by her doctors but refused to agree that she was insane or to change her religious views. In June 1863, in part due to pressure from her children who wished her released, the doctors declared that she was incurable and discharged her. Upon her discharge, Theophilus locked her in the nursery of their home and nailed the windows shut. Elizabeth managed to drop a letter complaining of this treatment out the window, which was delivered to her friend Sarah Haslett. Sarah Haslett in turn delivered the letter to Judge Charles Starr, who issued a writ of habeas corpus ordering Theophilus to bring Elizabeth to his chambers to discuss the matter. After being presented with Theophilus' evidence, Judge Starr scheduled a jury trial to allow a legal determination of Elizabeth's sanity to take place.

''Packard v. Packard''

At the subsequent trial of Packard v. Packard, which lasted five days, Theophilus' lawyers produced witnesses from his family who testified that Elizabeth had argued with her husband and tried to withdraw from his congregation. These witnesses concurred with Theophilus that this was a sign of insanity. The record from the Illinois State Hospital stating that Mrs Packard's condition was incurable was also entered into the court record.
Elizabeth's lawyers, Stephen Moore and John W. Orr, responded by calling witnesses from the neighborhood that knew the Packards but were not members of Theophilus' church. These witnesses testified they never saw Elizabeth exhibit any signs of insanity, while discussing religion or otherwise. The final witness was Dr. Duncanson, who was both a physician and a theologian. Dr. Duncanson had interviewed Elizabeth and he testified that while not necessarily in agreement with all her religious beliefs, arguing that "I do not call people insane because they differ with me. I pronounce her a sane woman and wish we had a nation of such women."
The jury took only seven minutes to find in Elizabeth's favor. She was legally declared sane, and Judge Charles Starr, who had changed the trial from one about habeas corpus to one about sanity, issued an order that she should not be confined. As scholar Kathryn Burns-Howard described it, we will never know Elizabeth's "true mental state or the details of her family life."

Life after the trial

When Elizabeth Packard returned to the home she shared with her husband in Manteno, Illinois, she found that the night before her release, her husband had rented their home to another family, sold her furniture, and had taken her money, notes, wardrobe, and children and left the state. She appealed to both the Supreme Court of Chicago and Boston, where her husband had taken her children, but had no legal recourse, as married women in these states at the time had no legal rights to their property or children. As such, the Anti-Insane Asylum Society was formed.
With that, she did not go back to her former life, but became a national celebrity of sorts, publishing "an armload of books and crisscrossed the United States on a decades-long reform campaign," fighting not only for married women's rights and freedom of speech, but called out "the power of insane asylums." She became what some scholars call "a publicist and lobbyist for better insanity laws." As scholar Kathryn Burns-Howard has argued, Packard reinvented herself in this role, earning enough to support her children and even her estranged husband, whom she remained separated with for the rest of her life. Ultimately, moderate supporters of women's rights in the northern U.S. embraced her, weaving her story into arguments about slavery, framing her experience as a type of enslavement, even arguing in the midst of the Civil War that a county in the midst of freeing African-American slaves should do the same for others, whom suffered from abusive husbands. Some argue that she seemed oblivious to her racial prejudice in arguing that white women had a “moral and spiritual nature” and suffered more "spiritual agony" than formerly enslaved African-Americans. Even so, some say that her story provided "a stirring example of oppressed womanhood" that others did not.
Elizabeth petitioned the Illinois and Massachusetts legislatures, and in 1869 legislation was passed in those states allowing married women equal rights to property and custody of their children. Upon this being passed, her husband voluntarily ceded custody of their children back to Elizabeth, and her children came to live with her in Chicago.
Elizabeth realized how narrow her legal victory had been. While she had escaped confinement, it was largely a measure of luck. The underlying social principles which had led to her confinement still existed. She founded the Anti-Insane Asylum Society and published several books, including Marital Power Exemplified, or Three Years Imprisonment for Religious Belief, Great Disclosure of Spiritual Wickedness in High Places, The Mystic Key or the Asylum Secret Unlocked, and The Prisoners' Hidden Life, Or Insane Asylums Unveiled. In 1867, the State of Illinois passed a "Bill for the Protection of Personal Liberty" which guaranteed all people accused of insanity, including wives, had the right to a public hearing. She also saw similar laws passed in three other states. Even so, she was strongly attacked by medical professionals and anonymous citizens, unlike others like Dorothea Dix, with her former doctor from the Jacksonville Insane Asylum, Dr. McFarland, privately calling her "a sort of Joan D'Arc in the matter of stirring up the personal prejudices." As such, Elizabeth's work on this front was "broadly unappreciated" while she was alive. She only received broader recognition starting in the 1930s by a well-known historian of mental illness, Albert Deutsch, and again in the 1960s from those whom were "attacking the medical model of insanity."
She died on July 25, 1897. In her obituary, The Inter Ocean, a Chicago newspaper, described her as "the reformer of insane asylum methods."

Literary uses

refers to Elizabeth Packard in some detail in her 2005 novel on the insanity of Mary Todd Lincoln
Emily Mann wrote the play Mrs Packard, which premiered in May 2007. In Mann's play, Packard describes her life fully in the insane asylum; it is considered historically accurate.