Divided government in the United States


In the United States, divided government describes a situation in which one party controls the executive branch while another party controls one or both houses of the legislative branch.
Divided government is seen by different groups as a benefit or as an undesirable product of the model of governance used in the U.S. political system. Under said model, known as the separation of powers, the state is divided into different branches. Each branch has separate and independent powers and areas of responsibility so that the powers of one branch are not in conflict with the powers associated with the others. However, the degree to which the president of the United States has control of Congress often determines his political strength - such as the ability to pass sponsored legislation, ratify treaties, and have Cabinet members and judges approved.
The model can be contrasted with the fusion of powers in a parliamentary system where the executive and legislature are unified. Those in favor of divided government believe that such separations encourage more policing of those in power by the opposition, as well as limiting spending and the expansion of undesirable laws. Opponents, however, argue that divided governments become lethargic, leading to many gridlocks. In the late 1980s, Terry M. Moe, a professor of political science at Stanford University, examined the issue. He concluded that divided governments lead to compromise which can be seen as beneficial, but he also noticed that divided governments subvert performance and politicize the decisions of executive agencies.
Early in the 20th century, divided government was rare, but since the 1970s it has become increasingly common.

Party control of legislative and executive branches since 1861

D denotes the Democratic Party and R denotes the Republican Party
YearPresidentSenateHouse
1861–1863RRR
1863–1865RRR
1865-1867DRR
1867-1869DRR
1869–1871RRR
1871–1873RRR
1873–1875RRR
1875-1877RRD
1877-1879RRD
1879-1881RDD
1881–1883RRR
1883-1885RRD
1885-1887DRD
1887-1889DRD
1889–1891RRR
1891-1893RRD
1893–1895DDD
1895-1897DRR
1897–1899RRR
1899–1901RRR
1901–1903RRR
1903–1905RRR
1905–1907RRR
1907–1909RRR
1909–1911RRR
1911-1913RRD
1913–1915DDD
1915–1917DDD
1917–1919DDD
1919-1921DRR
1921–1923RRR
1923–1925RRR
1925–1927RRR
1927–1929RRR
1929–1931RRR
1931-1933RRD
1933–1935DDD
1935–1937DDD
1937–1939DDD
1939–1941DDD
1941–1943DDD
1943–1945DDD
1945–1947DDD
1947-1949DRR
1949–1951DDD
1951–1953DDD
1953–1955RRR
1955-1957RDD
1957-1959RDD
1959-1961RDD
1961–1963DDD
1963–1965DDD
1965–1967DDD
1967–1969DDD
1969-1971RDD
1971-1973RDD
1973-1975RDD
1975-1977RDD
1977–1979DDD
1979–1981DDD
1981-1983RRD
1983-1985RRD
1985-1987RRD
1987-1989RDD
1989-1991RDD
1991-1993RDD
1993–1995DDD
1995-1997DRR
1997-1999DRR
1999-2001DRR
2001-2003RD*R
2003–2005RRR
2005–2007RRR
2007-2009RDD
2009–2011DDD
2011-2013DDR
2013-2015DDR
2015-2017DRR
2017-2019RRR
2019-2021RRD

*The 2000 election resulted in a 50–50 tie in the Senate, and the Constitution gives tie-breaking power to the vice president. The vice president was Democrat Al Gore from January 3, 2001 until the inauguration of Republican Richard Cheney on January 20. Then on May 24, Republican Senator Jim Jeffords of Vermont left the Republican Party to caucus with the Democrats as an independent, resulting in another shift of control.

Presidential impact

Many presidents' elections produced what is known as a coattail effect, in which the success of a presidential candidate also leads to electoral success for other members of his or her party. In fact, all newly elected presidents except Zachary Taylor, Richard Nixon, and George H. W. Bush were accompanied by control of at least one house of Congress.

Presidents by congressional control and terms won/served