District of Columbia Courts, Public Defender Service, and Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency Act of 2014


The District of Columbia Courts, Public Defender Service, and Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency Act of 2014 is a bill that would make changes to the District of Columbia Official Code that governs the D.C. Courts system.
The bill was introduced and passed in the United States House of Representatives during the 113th United States Congress.

Provisions of the bill

This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Research Service, a public domain source.
The District of Columbia Courts, Public Defender Service, and Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency Act of 2014 would amend the District of Columbia Code to authorize the Executive Officer of the District of Columbia courts to:
The bill would amend the National Capital Revitalization and Self-Government Improvement Act of 1997 to authorize the Director of the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency to develop and operate intermediate incentive programs for sentenced offenders.
The bill would make permanent the Director's authority to accept, solicit, and use on behalf of the Agency: any monetary or nonmonetary gift, donation, bequest, or use of facilities, property, or services to aid or facilitate the work of the Agency; and reimbursements from the District government for space and services provided, on a cost reimbursable basis.
The bill would amend the NCRS-GIA to:

Congressional Budget Office report

This summary is based largely on the summary provided by the Congressional Budget Office, as ordered reported by the House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform on March 12, 2014. This is a public domain source.
H.R. 4185 would make changes to the District of Columbia Official Code that governs the D.C. Courts system. Based on information provided by the court system, Congressional Budget Office estimates that the proposed changes would not have a significant effect on the federal budget. Enacting the legislation would affect direct spending because it would authorize the Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency to accept and spend monetary gifts. Therefore, pay-as-you-go procedures apply. However, CBO estimates that the net effect on direct spending would be insignificant. Enacting H.R. 4185 would not affect revenues.
Under current law, the budget of the D.C. Courts system, including the Public Defender Service and CSOSA, is funded by federal appropriations, and its expenditures are thus recorded in the federal budget. Among other changes, the bill would allow the D.C. Courts System to collect debts and erroneous payments owed by its employees, and to purchase uniforms for non-judicial employees. The bill also would allow CSOSA to operate incentive programs for prisoner education, accept and spend gifts, and receive reimbursement from the D.C. government for the use of office space in D.C. Courts facilities. Finally, the bill would allow the PDS to use unpaid volunteers. Based on information provided by the District of Columbia Courts, the PDS, and CSOSA, CBO estimates that the proposed changes would not have a significant effect on the federal budget.
H.R. 4185 contains no intergovernmental or private-sector mandates as defined in the Unfunded Mandates Reform Act and would impose no costs on state, local, or tribal governments.

Procedural history

The District of Columbia Courts, Public Defender Service, and Court Services and Offender Supervision Agency Act of 2014 was introduced on March 10, 2014 by Del. Eleanor Holmes Norton. The bill was referred to the United States House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The bill was ordered reported on July 3, 2014 alongside . On July 14, 2014, it was passed by the House in a voice vote.

Debate and discussion

According to the House Committee report on this bill, its purpose is to "provide increased flexibility for these three District entities, and will help them operate more efficiently and effectively."
Bill sponsor Eleanor Holmes Norton argued that the bill "will help make our local justice process more efficient and, therefore, more effective for the residents of the District."