Let be a metric space with a measure on the Borel sets with. Let where is the -extension of a set. The function is called the concentration rate of the space. The following equivalent definition has many applications: where the supremum is over all 1-Lipschitz functions, and the median is defined by the inequalities Informally, the space exhibits a concentration phenomenon if decays very fast as grows. More formally, a family of metric measure spaces is called a Lévy family if the corresponding concentration rates satisfy and a normal Lévy family if for some constants. For examples see below.
Concentration on the sphere
The first example goes back to Paul Lévy. According to the spherical isoperimetric inequality, among all subsets of the sphere with prescribed spherical measure, the spherical cap for suitable, has the smallest -extension . Applying this to sets of measure , one can deduce the following concentration inequality: where are universal constants. Therefore meet the definition above of a normal Lévy family. Vitali Milman applied this fact to several problems in the local theory of Banach spaces, in particular, to give a new proof of Dvoretzky's theorem.
Concentration of measure in physics
All classical statistical physics is based on the concentration of measure phenomena: The fundamental idea about equivalence of ensembles in thermodynamic limit is exactly the thin shell concentration theorem. For each mechanical system consider the phase space equipped by the invariant Liouville measure and conserving energyE. The microcanonical ensemble is just an invariant distribution over the surface of constant energy E obtained by Gibbs as the limit of distributionsin phase space with constant density in thin layers between the surfaces of states with energy E and with energy E+ΔE. The canonical ensemble is given by the probability density in the phase space where quantities F=const and T=const are defined by the conditions of probability normalisation and the given expectation of energy E. When the number of particles is large, then the difference between average values of the macroscopic variables for the canonical and microcanonical ensembles tends to zero, and their fluctuations are explicitly evaluated. These results are proven rigorously under some regularity conditions on the energy functionE by Khinchin. The simplest particular case when E is a sum of squares was well-known in detail before Khinchin and Lévy and even before Gibbs and Einstein. This is the Maxwell–Boltzmann distribution of the particle energy in ideal gas. The microcanonical ensemble is very natural from the naïve physical point of view: this is just a natural equidistribution on the isoenergetic hypersurface. The canonical ensemble is very useful because of an important property: if a system consists of two non-interacting subsystems, i.e. if the energy E is the sum,, where are the states of the subsystems, then the equilibrium states of subsystems are independent, the equilibrium distribution of the system is the product of equilibrium distributions of the subsystems with the same T. The equivalence of these ensembles is the cornerstone of the mechanical foundations of thermodynamics.