The most common radiopharmaceutical for bone scintigraphy is 99mTc with methylene diphosphonate. Other bone radiopharmaceuticals include 99mTc with HDP, HMDP and DPD. MDP adsorbs onto the crystalline hydroxyapatite mineral of bone. Mineralisation occurs at osteoblasts, representing sites of bone growth, where MDP "bind to the hydroxyapatite crystals in proportion to local blood flow and osteoblastic activity and are therefore markers of bone turnover and bone perfusion". The more active the bone turnover, the more radioactive material will be seen. Some tumors, fractures and infections show up as areas of increased uptake.
Technique
In a typical bone scan technique, the patient is injected with up to 740 MBq of technetium-99m-MDP and then scanned with a gamma camera, which captures planar anterior and posterior or single photon emission computed tomography images. In order to view small lesions SPECT imaging technique may be preferred over planar scintigraphy. In a single phase protocol, which will primarily highlight osteoblasts, images are usually acquired 2–5 hours after the injection. A two or three phase protocol utilises additional scans at different points after the injection to obtain additional diagnostic information. A dynamic study immediately after the injection captures perfusion information. A second phase "blood pool" image following the perfusion can help to diagnose inflammatory conditions or problems of blood supply. A typical effective dose obtained during a bone scan is 6.3 millisieverts.
PET bone imaging
Although bone scintigraphy generally refers to gamma camera imaging of 99mTc radiopharmaceuticals, imaging with positron emission tomography scanners is also possible, using fluorine-18 sodium fluoride. For quantitative measurements, 99mTc-MDP has some advantages over NaF. MDP renal clearance is not affected by urine flow rate and simplified data analysis can be employed which assumes steady state conditions. It has negligible tracer uptake in red blood cells, therefore correction for plasma to whole blood ratios is not required unlike NaF. However, disadvantages include higher rates of protein binding, and less diffusibility due to higher molecular weight than NaF, leading to lower capillary permeability. There are several advantages of the PET technique, which are common to PET imaging in general, including improved spatial resolution and more developed attenuation correction techniques. Patient experience is improved as imaging can be started much more quickly following radiopharmaceutical injection. NaF PET is hampered by high demand for scanners, and limited tracer availability.