Antiwar.com is a website which describes itself as devoted to "non-interventionism" and as opposing imperialism and war. It is a project of the Randolph Bourne Institute. The website states that it is "fighting the next information war: we are dedicated to the proposition that war hawks and our leaders are not going to be allowed to get away with it unopposed and unchallenged."
History
The site was founded in December 1995, as a response to the Bosnian war. It is a 501 nonprofit foundation, operating under the auspices of the Randolph Bourne Institute, based in Atherton, California. It was previously affiliated with the Center for Libertarian Studies and functioned before that as an independent, ad-supported website. In 2011, the site discovered it was being monitored by the Federal Bureau of Investigation. After their Freedom of Information Act request failed to produce results, they worked with the American Civil Liberties Union of Northern California which in May 2013 filed a freedom of the press lawsuit for full FBI records on Antiwar.com, Eric Garris and Justin Raimondo. The documents received in November 2013 indicated that the FBI in San Francisco, and later in Newark, New Jersey, began monitoring the site after Eric Garris passed along to the FBI a threat to hack the Antiwar.com website. The FBI mistakenly took this as an actual threat against its own website and began monitoring Antiwar.com and its editors. Eric Garris demanded the FBI correct its file. In September 2019, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that the FBI must delete its memo documenting Garris' First Amendment activities.
Stance
The site's first objective "was to fight against intervention in the Balkans under the Clinton presidency." It "applied the same principles to Clinton's campaigns in Haiti and Kosovo and bombings of Sudan and Afghanistan." Antiwar.com opposed the US wars in Iraq and Afghanistan and generally opposes interventionism, including the US bombing of Serbia and continuing occupation of Afghanistan. It has also condemned aggressive military action and other forms of belligerence on the part of other governments, as well as what contributors view as the fiscal and civil libertiesconsequences of war. Wen Stephenson of The Atlantic described the site as marked by "a decidely right-wing cast of thought." Its founders characterize themselves as libertarians, and the two principal co-founders were involved in libertarian Republican politics, at the time. The site features many writers from across the political spectrum, including conservatives such as Pat Buchanan, right libertarians such as Ron Paul, and left libertarians such as Noam Chomsky and Juan Cole.
The site syndicates columns and op-eds by such authors as:
Pat Buchanan
Kevin Carson
Noam Chomsky
Alexander Cockburn
Juan Cole
Jonathan Cook
Robert Fisk
Kathy Kelly
William Lind
Ron Paul
John Pilger
Gareth Porter
Charley Reese
Paul Craig Roberts
Cindy Sheehan
Norman Solomon
Antiwar Radio
Antiwar Radio is hosted by Scott Horton and others including Charles Goyette. It features interviews focused on war, international relations, the growth of state power, civil liberties, and related matters. Guests have included:
Larisa Alexandrovna
Mark Ames
Julian Assange
David T. Beito
James Bovard
Francis Boyle
David Bromwich
Noam Chomsky
Patrick Cockburn
Juan Cole
Robert Dreyfuss
Jeff Frazee
Sibel Edmonds
Ivan Eland
Daniel Ellsberg
Philip Giraldi
Charles Goyette
Glenn Greenwald
William Norman Grigg
David R. Henderson
Nat Hentoff
Robert Higgs
Scott Horton
Dahr Jamail
Raed Jarrar
Karen Kwiatkowski
Jim Lobe
Trevor Lyman
Eric Margolis
Ray McGovern
Cole Miller
Brandon Neely
Robert Pape
Ron Paul
Gareth Porter
Coleen Rowley
Kirkpatrick Sale
Michael Scheuer
Cindy Sheehan
Helen Thomas
Christina Tobin
Jesse Trentadue
Jesse Walker
Philip Weiss
Andy Worthington
Kevin Zeese
Reactions
According to Eric Margolis, "Americans would have been totally misled had it not been for the Internet sites like Antiwar.com; CommonDreams; LewRockwell; and Bigeye; and magazines like The American Conservative and Harpers." George Szamuely said in 2000 that "Antiwar.com now easily outshines the dreary foreign policy mags filled with the self-important vacuities of the Washington apparat." Antiwar.com is "a thoughtful, well-organized site," according to The Washington Posts Linton Weeks. Scott McConnell wrote in the New York Press that Antiwar.com was "strikingly successful" and "could claim more readers than Rupert Murdoch’s Weekly Standard once the war began."