African Peer Review Mechanism
The African Peer Review Mechanism is a mutually agreed instrument voluntarily acceded to by the member states of the African Union as a self-monitoring mechanism. It was founded in 2003.
The mandate of the APRM is to encourage conformity with regards to political, economic and corporate governance values, codes and standards, among African countries and the objectives in socio-economic development as well as to ensure monitoring and evaluation of AU Agenda 2063 and SDGs 2030.
Africa's Self- Assessment for Good Governance
A Specialized Agency of the African Union, the African Peer Review Mechanism was initiated in 2002 and established in 2003 by the African Union in the framework of the implementation of the .APRM is a tool for sharing experiences, reinforcing best practices, identifying deficiencies, and assessing capacity-building needs to foster policies, standards and practices that lead to political stability, high economic growth, sustainable development and accelerated sub-regional and continental economic integration.
Member countries within the APRM undertake self-monitoring in all aspects of their governance and socio-economic development. African Union stakeholders participate in the self-assessment of all branches of government – executive, legislative and judicial – as well as the private sector, civil society and the media. The APRM Review Process gives member states a space for national dialogue on governance and socio-economic indicators and an opportunity to build consensus on the way forward.
The APR Forum of Heads of State and Government adopted the and the APRM Statute at the 25th Summit of the APR Forum held in Nairobi, Kenya. The 28th AU Assembly of Heads of States and Government further extended the APRM's mandate to include tracking of the implementation and overseeing the Continent's key governance initiatives. In addition, the AU Assembly further extended the mandate of the APRM to include monitoring of the implementation of the African Union Agenda 2063 and United Nations Sustainable Development Goals, Agenda 2030.
In 2018, the 11th AU Extraordinary Summit of Head of States and Government reached the decision to fully integrate the APRM to the African Union in accordance to Assembly/AU/Dec.635 decision adopted by 28th Ordinary Session of the Assembly Union held in Addis Ababa. The Assembly further encouraged the universal accession of AU member countries to the APRM, now counting 40 members with the accession of the Republic of Seychelles and Zimbabwe at the 32th APR Forum in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia, in January 2020.
Four Types Of Country Reviews
1. Base Review – carried out immediately after a country becomes a member of the APRM2. Periodic Review every four years
3. Targeted Review – requested by the member country itself outside the framework of mandated reviews
4. A Review commissioned by the APR Forum when there are early signs of pending political and economic crisis.
Four Thematic Areas
1. Democracy and Political Governance2. Economic Governance and Management
3. Corporate Governance
4. Broad-based Sustainable Socio-economic Development
The Five Stages of A Peer Review
Consultation
The APR Secretariat and the Country under review consult on the process overview and terms of the Memorandum of Understanding. The Country under review creates a Focal Point to liaise with the Secretariat and provide it with relevant laws, treaty ratifications, budgets and development plans. The Secretariat prepares a background assessment document. At the same time, the Country under review independently completes the APR Self-Assessment Questionnaire, gathers inputs from civil society and drafts a paper outlining the nation's issues and a National Programme of Action with clear steps and deadlines on how it plans to conform to APRM codes and standards, the African Union Charter, and UN obligations. The Country Review Team that is set up writes a report outlining issues to be focused on during the review mission.2. THE REVIEW MISSION
Visits the Country under review and conducts broad-based consultations with government, officials, political parties, parliamentarians, and representatives of civil society organisations, and the private sector. The mission typically lasts two-and-a-half to three weeks.
3. DRAFT REPORT
The APR Country Review Team drafts a report on the Country under review.
4.THE PEER REVIEW
takes place at the level of the APR Forum, using the APR Panel's report on the team's findings as a basis. The APR Forum discusses these recommendations with the Reviewed Country's leadership.
5. FINAL REPORT
Within six months, after the peer review, the published Country Review Report must be tabled in sub-regional institutions. The report is then made publicly available.
The Second Generation Review
The objective of the APRM Second Generation Review is to assess progress made in Governance and Socio-economic Development in Member States in the period since the Base Review. The specific objectives are to:- reinvigorate, rationalize and institutionalize the APRM in governance reforms within a Member States.
- appraise to what extent the National Programme of Action is implemented and its continued relevance, on the basis of which a new NPOA with a few key actions will be proposed;
- facilitate the development of a second NPOA with greater focus and based only on key actions; and
- make the APRM Review process more relevant to citizens’ needs, more cost-effective and in tune with the Agenda 2063 priorities and goals.
What Happens After The Country Review
Governing Bodies Of The APRM
APR FORUM
Highest decision-making authority.APR PANEL
Oversees the review process to ensure its independence, professionalism and credibility, and reports to the Forum. The APR Panel is also responsible for selecting and appointing and the Review Teams.
COMMITTEE OF FOCAL POINTS
Committee of representatives of Heads of State and Government
Manages the budgetary process, resource mobilisation through Member States, Strategic and Development Partners, and the APRM Trust Fund and Audit.
National Governing Council
The National Governance Commission/National Governing Council is the body that oversees implementation of the APRM process at the Member State level. In addition to providing guidance in terms of policy direction, the NGC ensures professionalism, credibility and independence of the national APRM self-assessment and review processes. The NGC is composed of key stakeholder groups from government, civil society and the private sector, in line with the APRM principle of broad-based participation.
APRM SECRETARIAT
Provides technical, coordinating and administrative support services. It must have sufficient capacity for the analytical work that underpins the peer review process.
Membership Of The APRM
Membership of the APRM is voluntary and open to all African Union countries. Accession begins with an expression of interest in membership followed by the signing of a Memorandum of Understanding between the country and the APR Forum.40 Member Countries
Algeria
Angola
Benin
Botswana
Burkina Faso
Cameroon
Chad
Côte d'Ivoire
Djibouti
Egypt
Equatorial Guinea
Ethiopia
Gabon
Gambia
Ghana
Kenya
Lesotho
Liberia
Malawi
Mali
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mozambique
Republic of Niger
Namibia
Nigeria
Republic of Congo
Rwanda
São Tomé and Príncipe
Senegal
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
South Africa
Sudan
Tanzania
Togo
Tunisia
Uganda
Zambia
Zimbabwe
Strategic Partners
The APRM has entered into special support agreements with partner institutions designated by the Forum as Strategic Partners. These are: African Capacity Building Foundation, the African Development Bank ; Mo Ibrahim Foundation; United Nations Economic Commission for Africa ; Office of the Special Advisor on Africa ; United Nations Development Programme Regional Bureau for Africa.CONTACT US
P.O. Box 1234, Halfway House
Midrand 1685, South Africa.
Physical Address:
No 230; 15th Road, First Floor; Randjespark; Midrand, 1682
Tel: + 27 11 256 3401
Website: www.aprm-au.org
Follow us
Facebook:
Twitter: @APRMorg
YouTube: https://www.youtube.com/APRMechanism
APRM documents
- The APRM base document
- The Memorandum of Understanding
- Guidelines for Countries to prepare for and participate in the APRM
- Organisation and Processes
- Accessed on May 27, 2006.
Critiques and studies of the APRM process
- Grant Masterson, EISA, February 2005
- Paper by Ayesha Kajee on the APRM, 2004, accessed on May 27, 2006.
- eAfrica October 2003 by Ross Herbert, accessed on May 27, 2006.
- Report by OSIEA/AfriMAP, April 2007
- Report by Ligue des Droits de la Personne dans la Région des Grands Lacs, January 2007
- Partnership Africa Canada, October 2005
- , UNECA, 2005
- Eduard Jordaan, African Affairs, April 2006
- , Eric Opoku, UNDP, December 2006
- , Adotey Bing-Pappoe, AfriMAP & OSIWA, June 2007
- Sheila Bunwaree, AfriMAP & OSISA, August 2007
- Report to the , January 2008
- , Ross Herbert and Steven Gruzd, South African Institute of International Affairs, March 2008
- Juliet Nakato Odoi, SAIIA, June 2008
- , Nick Hutchings, Mukelani Dimba, and Alison Tilley, SAIIA, June 2008
- , Faten Aggad, SAIIA, June 2008
- , George Katito, SAIIA, June 2008
- , Adele Jinadu, AfriMAP, August 2008
- Gilles Badet, AfriMAP, August 2008
- , Brendan Boyle, SAIIA, September 2008
- , Raymond Louw, SAIIA, September 2008