Abelisauridae


Abelisauridae is a family of ceratosaurian theropod dinosaurs. Abelisaurids thrived during the Cretaceous period, on the ancient southern supercontinent of Gondwana, and today their fossil remains are found on the modern continents of Africa and South America, as well as on the Indian subcontinent and the island of Madagascar. Reports based on isolated teeth show the occurrence in the Late Jurassic of Portugal, and the confirmed existence of European Abelisaurids comes from the Late Cretaceous of France with Arcovenator. Abelisaurids first appear in the fossil record of the early middle Jurassic period, and at least two genera survived until the end of the Mesozoic era 66 million years ago.
Like most theropods, abelisaurids were carnivorous bipeds. They were characterized by stocky hind limbs and extensive ornamentation of the skull bones, with grooves and pits. In many abelisaurids, such as Carnotaurus, the fore limbs are vestigial, the skull is shorter, and bony crests grow above the eyes. Most of the known abelisaurids would have been between 5 and 9 m in length, from snout to tip of tail, with a new and as yet unnamed specimen from northwestern Turkana in Kenya, Africa reaching a possible length of 11–12 m. Before becoming well known, fragmentary abelisaurid remains were occasionally misidentified as possible South American tyrannosaurids.

Description

Abelisaurid hind limbs were more typical of ceratosaurs, with the astragalus and calcaneum fused to each other and to the tibia, forming a tibiotarsus. The tibia was shorter than the femur, giving the hind limb stocky proportions. Three functional digits were on the foot, while the first digit, or hallux, did not contact the ground.

Skull

Although skull proportions varied, abelisaurid skulls were generally very tall and very short in length. In Carnotaurus, for example, the skull was nearly as tall as it was long. The premaxilla in abelisaurids was very tall, so the front of the snout was blunt, not tapered as seen in many other theropods.
Two skull bones, the lacrimal and postorbital bones, projected into the eye socket from the front and back, nearly dividing it into two compartments. The eye would have been located in the upper compartment, which was tilted slightly outwards in Carnotaurus, perhaps providing some degree of binocular vision. The lacrimal and postorbital also met above the eye socket, to form a ridge or brow above the eye.
Sculpturing is seen on many of the skull bones, in the form of long grooves, pits, and protrusions. Like other ceratosaurs, the frontal bones of the skull roof were fused together. Carnotaurines commonly had bony projections from the skull. Carnotaurus had two pronounced horns, projecting outward above the eyes, while its close relative Aucasaurus had smaller projections in the same area. Majungasaurus and Rajasaurus had a single bony horn or dome, projecting upwards from the skull. These projections, like the horns of many modern animals, might have been displayed for species recognition or intimidation. In Arcovenator, the dorsal margin of the postorbital is thickened dorsolaterally, forming a strong and rugose bony brow ridge rising above the level of the skull roof. Possibly, this rugose brow ridge supported a keratinous or scaly structure for displays.

Fore limbs and hands

Data for the abelisaurid fore limbs are known from Eoabelisaurus and the carnotaurines Aucasaurus, Carnotaurus, and Majungasaurus. All had small fore limbs, which seem to have been vestigial. The bones of the forearm were extremely short, only 25% of the length of the upper arm in Carnotaurus and 33% in Aucasaurus. The entire arm was held straight, and the elbow joint was immobile.
As is typical for ceratosaurs, the abelisaurid hand had four basic digits, but any similarity ends there. No wrist bones existed, with the four palm bones attaching directly to the forearm. No phalanges were on the first or fourth digits, only one on the second digit and two on the third digit. These two external fingers were extremely short and immobile. Manual claws were very small in Eoabelisaurus, and totally absent in carnotaurines.
More primitive relatives such as Noasaurus and Ceratosaurus had longer, mobile arms with fingers and claws. Paleobiologist Alexander O. Vargas suggested a major reason for the evolution towards vestigial fore limbs in the group was because of a genetic defect; the loss of function in HOXA11 and HOXD11, two genes that regulate the fore limbs' development.

Distribution

Abelisauroids are typically regarded as a Cretaceous group, though the earliest abelisaurid remains are known from the Middle Jurassic of Argentina and possibly Madagascar ; possible abelisaurid remains were also discovered in Late Jurassic Tendaguru Beds in Tanzania. Abelisaurid remains are mainly known in the southern continents, which once made up the supercontinent of Gondwana. When first described in 1985, only Carnotaurus and Abelisaurus were known, both from the Late Cretaceous of South America. Abelisaurids were then located in Late Cretaceous India and Madagascar, which were closely connected for much of the Cretaceous. It was thought that the absence of abelisaurids from continental Africa indicated that the group evolved after the separation of Africa from Gondwana, around 100 million years ago. However, the discovery of Rugops and other abelisaurid material from the middle of the Cretaceous in northern Africa disproved this hypothesis. Mid-Cretaceous abelisaurids are now known from South America as well, showing that the group existed prior to the breakup of Gondwana. In 2014, the description of Arcovenator escotae from southern France provided the first indisputable evidence of the presence of Abelisaurids in Europe. Arcovenator presents strong similarities with the Madagascan Majungasaurus and Indian abelisaurids, but not with the South American forms. Arcovenator, Majungasaurus, and Indian forms are united in the new clade Majungasaurinae.

Classification

s Jose Bonaparte and Fernando Novas coined the name Abelisauridae in 1985 when they described the eponymous Abelisaurus. The name is formed from the family name of Roberto Abel, who discovered Abelisaurus, and from the Greek word σαυρος meaning lizard. The very common suffix -idae is usually applied to zoological family names and is derived from the Greek suffix -ιδαι, which indicates a plural noun.
Abelisauridae is a family in rank-based Linnaean taxonomy, within the infraorder Ceratosauria and the superfamily Abelisauroidea, which also contains the family Noasauridae. It has had several definitions in phylogenetic taxonomy. It was originally defined as a node-based taxon including Abelisaurus, Carnotaurus, their common ancestor, and all of its descendants.
Later, it was redefined as a stem-based taxon, including all animals more closely related to Abelisaurus than to Noasaurus. The node-based definition would not include animals such as Rugops or Ilokelesia, which are thought to be more basal than Abelisaurus and would be included by a stem-based definition. Within the Abelisauridae is the subgroup Carnotaurinae, and among carnotaurines, Aucasaurus and Carnotaurus are united in Carnotaurini.

Shared characteristics

Complete skeletons have been described only for the most advanced abelisaurids, making establishment of defining features of the skeleton for the family as a whole more difficult. However, most are known from at least some skull bones, so known shared features come mainly from the skull. Many abelisaurid skull features are shared with carcharodontosaurids. These shared features, along with the fact that abelisaurids seem to have replaced carcharodontosaurids in South America, have led to suggestions that the two groups were related. However, no cladistic analysis has ever found such a relationship, and aside from the skull, abelisaurids and carcharodontosaurids are very different, more similar to ceratosaurs and allosauroids, respectively.

Phylogeny

Below is a cladogram generated by Tortosa et al. in the description of Arcovenator and creation of a new subfamily Majungasaurinae.
Ilokelesia was originally described as a sister group to the Abelisauroidea. However, Sereno tentatively places it closer to Abelisaurus than to noasaurids, a result which agrees with several other recent analyses. If a stem-based definition is used, Ilokelesia and Rugops are therefore basal abelisaurids. However, as they are more basal than Abelisaurus, they are outside of the Abelisauridae if the node-based definition is adopted. Ekrixinatosaurus was also published in 2004, so it was not included in Sereno's analysis. However, an independent analysis, performed by Jorge Calvo and colleagues, shows it to be an abelisaurid.
Some scientists include Xenotarsosaurus from Argentina and Compsosuchus from India as basal abelisaurids, while others consider them to be outside the Abelisauroidea. The French Genusaurus and Tarascosaurus have also been called abelisaurids but both are fragmentary and may be more basal ceratosaurians.
, a close relative of the Abelisauridae
With the description of
Skorpiovenator in 2008, Canale et al. published another phylogenetic analysis focusing on the South American abelisaurids. In their results, they found that all South American forms, including Ilokelesia, grouped together as a subclade of carnotaurines, which they named the Brachyrostra. In the same year Matthew T. Carrano and Scott D. Sampson published new large phylogenetic analysis of ceratosaurian. With the description of Eoabelisaurus'', Diego Pol and Oliver W. M. Rauhut combined these analyses and added 10n new characters. The following cladogram follows their analysis.
Timeline of descriptions of genera


ImageSize = width:1000px height:auto barincrement:15px
PlotArea = left:10px bottom:50px top:10px right:10px
Period = from:1930 till:2100
TimeAxis = orientation:horizontal
ScaleMajor = unit:year increment:50 start:1930
ScaleMinor = unit:year increment:10 start:1930
TimeAxis = orientation:hor
AlignBars = justify
Colors =
#legends
id:CAR value:claret
id:ANK value:rgb
id:HER value:teal
id:HAD value:green
id:OMN value:blue
id:black value:black
id:white value:white
id:1900s value:rgb
id:2000s value:rgb
id:2000syears value:rgb
id:1900syears value:rgb
id:1700s value:rgb
id:1700syears value:rgb
id:latecretaceous value:rgb
id:1800syears value:rgb
id:paleogene value:rgb
id:paleocene value:rgb
id:eocene value:rgb
id:oligocene value:rgb
id:1800s value:rgb
id:miocene value:rgb
id:pliocene value:rgb
id:quaternary value:rgb
id:pleistocene value:rgb
id:holocene value:rgb
BarData=
bar:eratop
bar:space
bar:periodtop
bar:space
bar:NAM1
bar:NAM2
bar:NAM3
bar:NAM4
bar:NAM5
bar:NAM6
bar:NAM7
bar:NAM8
bar:NAM9
bar:NAM10
bar:space
bar:period
bar:space
bar:era
PlotData=
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark: width:25
shift:

bar:periodtop
from: 1930 till: 1940 color:1900syears text:30s
from: 1940 till: 1950 color:1900syears text:40s
from: 1950 till: 1960 color:1900syears text:50s
from: 1960 till: 1970 color:1900syears text:60s
from: 1970 till: 1980 color:1900syears text:70s
from: 1980 till: 1990 color:1900syears text:80s
from: 1990 till: 2000 color:1900syears text:90s
from: 2000 till: 2010 color:2000syears text:00s
from: 2010 till: 2020 color:2000syears text:10s
from: 2020 till: 2030 color:2000syears text:20s
from: 2030 till: 2040 color:2000syears text:30s
from: 2040 till: 2050 color:2000syears text:40s
from: 2050 till: 2060 color:2000syears text:50s
from: 2060 till: 2070 color:2000syears text:60s
from: 2070 till: 2080 color:2000syears text:70s
from: 2080 till: 2090 color:2000syears text:80s
from: 2090 till: 2100 color:2000syears text:90s
bar:eratop
from: 1930 till: 2000 color:1900s text:20th
from: 2000 till: 2100 color:2000s text:21st
PlotData=
align:left fontsize:M mark: width:5 anchor:till align:left
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:1933 mark: text:Indosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:1933 mark: text:Indosuchus
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:1955 mark: text:Majungasaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:1985 mark: text:Abelisaurus
color:1800s bar:NAM2 at:1985 mark: text:Carnotaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM3 at:1986 mark: text:Xenotarsosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM4 at:1991 mark: text:Tarascosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM5 at:1998 mark: text:Ilokelesia
color:1900s bar:NAM1 at:2001 mark: text:Quilmesaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM2 at:2002 mark: text:Pycnonemosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM6 at:2002 mark: text:Aucasaurus
color:1800s bar:NAM7 at:2003 mark: text:Rajasaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM8 at:2004 mark: text:Rugops
color:1900s bar:NAM9 at:2004 mark: text:Ekrixinatosaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM3 at:2008 mark: text:Kryptops
color:1800s bar:NAM10 at:2009 mark: text:Skorpiovenator
color:1900s bar:NAM4 at:2010 mark: text:Rahiolisaurus
color:1900s bar:NAM5 at:2013 mark: text:Arcovenator
color:1900s bar:NAM6 at:2018 mark: text:Thanos
color:1900s bar:NAM7 at:2020 mark: text:Tralkasaurus
PlotData=
align:center textcolor:black fontsize:M mark: width:25
bar:period
from: 1930 till: 1940 color:1900syears text:30s
from: 1940 till: 1950 color:1900syears text:40s
from: 1950 till: 1960 color:1900syears text:50s
from: 1960 till: 1970 color:1900syears text:60s
from: 1970 till: 1980 color:1900syears text:70s
from: 1980 till: 1990 color:1900syears text:80s
from: 1990 till: 2000 color:1900syears text:90s
from: 2000 till: 2010 color:2000syears text:00s
from: 2010 till: 2020 color:2000syears text:10s
from: 2020 till: 2030 color:2000syears text:20s
from: 2030 till: 2040 color:2000syears text:30s
from: 2040 till: 2050 color:2000syears text:40s
from: 2050 till: 2060 color:2000syears text:50s
from: 2060 till: 2070 color:2000syears text:60s
from: 2070 till: 2080 color:2000syears text:70s
from: 2080 till: 2090 color:2000syears text:80s
from: 2090 till: 2100 color:2000syears text:90s
bar:era
from: 1930 till: 2000 color:1900s text:20th
from: 2000 till: 2100 color:2000s text:21st

Paleobiology

Ontogeny and growth

Studies of the abelisaurid Majungasaurus indicate that it was a much slower-growing dinosaur than other theropods, taking nearly 20 years to reach adult size. Similar studies on other abelisaurid genera indicate that this slow maturation may have been a common trait to the whole of the Abelisauridae.